1993
DOI: 10.1021/ic00074a030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Further neighbor magnetic exchange interaction in a novel pseudolinear tetramer of copper(II)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
(1 reference statement)
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[27] Testing the influence of each interaction parameter on the quality of the fit, J 4 was found to be of no influence, while J 3 was found to be undetermined when allowed to vary freely together with J 2 . Indeed, although it was observed in a specific case, [27] a significant coupling between fourth neighboring spins (J 4 ) is unlikely.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…[27] Testing the influence of each interaction parameter on the quality of the fit, J 4 was found to be of no influence, while J 3 was found to be undetermined when allowed to vary freely together with J 2 . Indeed, although it was observed in a specific case, [27] a significant coupling between fourth neighboring spins (J 4 ) is unlikely.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[27] Testing the influence of each interaction parameter on the quality of the fit, J 4 was found to be of no influence, while J 3 was found to be undetermined when allowed to vary freely together with J 2 . Indeed, although it was observed in a specific case, [27] a significant coupling between fourth neighboring spins (J 4 ) is unlikely. On the other hand, given the low spin density in the axial position for a close to square-pyramidal coordination environment, the central coupling pathway through the two oxygen atoms in axial and equatorial positions (J 2 ) can be expected to be more significant than that through the carbonato bridge also with one axial and one equatorial oxygen atom (J 3 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[21] Here we assumed g Cu = g rad = g, which was also adopted in analyzing the magnetic properties of complexes 2 and 3. Equation (1), which was derived from the Van Vleck equation, was employed to fit the observed χ M T versus T plot by means of a least-squares method.…”
Section: Magnetic Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To analyze the magnetic behavior of complex 2 more quantitatively, we considered a central symmetric linear tetramer of four S = ½ spins, S 1 -S 2 -S 3 -S 4 , with the exchange Hamiltonian of H = -2J 1 (S 1 S 2 + S 3 S 4 ) -2J 2 S 2 S 3 , [21] in which two exchange coupling constants are obtained. S 2 and S 3 refer to copper(II) ions, S 1 and S 4 refer to the nitroxide sites of the NITpPy radicals, and J 1 and J 2 stand for the copper(II)-copper(II) and copper(II)-radical magnetic interactions, respectively.…”
Section: Magnetic Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%