1996
DOI: 10.1016/0020-7683(95)00224-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Further investigation for the macro-microcrack interaction I—in the infinite isotropic body

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 16 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is seen from Figs 8 and 9 that the NSIF or the NERR taken as measures of the macro–microcrack interaction show similar trends in both dissimilar and homogenous anisotropic materials disregarding some minor differences in magnitude. However, unlike the situation in isotropic or orthotropic materials, 25,26 Figs 8a and b, 9a and b are remarkably different. Particularly in almost all mismatch conditions considered, the NSIF and NERR predict different values of the neutral shielding angle β N (i.e., ( K ∞ 1 +Δ K 1 )/ K ∞ 1 = 1 or G t / G ∞ = 1) (see Table 2), at which a transition from amplification (( K ∞ 1 +Δ K 1 )/ K ∞ 1 > 1 or G t / G ∞ > 1) to shielding (( K ∞ 1 +Δ K 1 )/ K ∞ 1 < 1 or G t / G ∞ < 1) occurs.…”
Section: Numerical Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…It is seen from Figs 8 and 9 that the NSIF or the NERR taken as measures of the macro–microcrack interaction show similar trends in both dissimilar and homogenous anisotropic materials disregarding some minor differences in magnitude. However, unlike the situation in isotropic or orthotropic materials, 25,26 Figs 8a and b, 9a and b are remarkably different. Particularly in almost all mismatch conditions considered, the NSIF and NERR predict different values of the neutral shielding angle β N (i.e., ( K ∞ 1 +Δ K 1 )/ K ∞ 1 = 1 or G t / G ∞ = 1) (see Table 2), at which a transition from amplification (( K ∞ 1 +Δ K 1 )/ K ∞ 1 > 1 or G t / G ∞ > 1) to shielding (( K ∞ 1 +Δ K 1 )/ K ∞ 1 < 1 or G t / G ∞ < 1) occurs.…”
Section: Numerical Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%