2016
DOI: 10.1049/iet-cta.2015.0990
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Further improvement in delay‐dependent finite‐time stability criteria for uncertain continuous‐time systems with time‐varying delays

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
(54 reference statements)
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Note that in practice, uncertain time‐varying parameters often exist such as the time‐varying mass of electromagnetic levitation system 15 due to the movement of passengers, loading of luggage, etc. Assumption 2 means that unknown delay τ(t) is only required to be finite and its bound is not known unlike 2,5,6,24 . Moreover, τ(t) can be fast‐varying without any restriction on time‐varying rate of the delay such as τ˙(t)<1 considered in 8,24,25 . Note that the predictor control methods of Reference 1,4,6 are not directly applicable to our considered system () because there is no information on the upper bound and time‐varying rate of the delay.…”
Section: Problem Statementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that in practice, uncertain time‐varying parameters often exist such as the time‐varying mass of electromagnetic levitation system 15 due to the movement of passengers, loading of luggage, etc. Assumption 2 means that unknown delay τ(t) is only required to be finite and its bound is not known unlike 2,5,6,24 . Moreover, τ(t) can be fast‐varying without any restriction on time‐varying rate of the delay such as τ˙(t)<1 considered in 8,24,25 . Note that the predictor control methods of Reference 1,4,6 are not directly applicable to our considered system () because there is no information on the upper bound and time‐varying rate of the delay.…”
Section: Problem Statementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can be seen from According to Remark 8, the optimal bound with minimum value of c 2 relies on the parameter , we can find feasible solution when 1.1 ≤ ≤ 3.57. Solving the optimation problem (23), the minimum value of c 2 is 10, when = 1.3994. Figure 4 shows the optimal value with different value of .…”
Section: Discretizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, the concept of finite-time stability has been revisited in the light of linear matrix inequalities (LMIs) techniques and Lyapunov functional theory [20][21][22]. For instance, further improvement in delay-dependent finite-time stability criteria was investigated for uncertain continuous-time systems with time-varying delays in [23]. In regard to finite time stability for time-varying system, Amato has made great contributions, see, for example [24][25][26][27][28].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some work [1]- [5] have shown that time delay is the factor causes the instability and poor performance in nonlinear systems. In the real world, there exists a particular type of practical systems called positive systems whose states variables are confined to be positive (at least nonnegative) for any nonnegative initial condition [6]- [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%