2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemolab.2011.03.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Further exploring rm2 metrics for validation of QSPR models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
245
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 490 publications
(250 citation statements)
references
References 125 publications
5
245
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are also blocked attributes (correlation weight is equal Table 2. Criteria of predictability [19,20] for models calculated with the CORAL software.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There are also blocked attributes (correlation weight is equal Table 2. Criteria of predictability [19,20] for models calculated with the CORAL software.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 2 contains statistical criteria of the predictability of the models. [18,19] One can see (Table 2) that the predictability for all splits is quite good. Figure 2 displays graphical representation of the models developed for four splits.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…All parameters listed below Eq. (2) and employed to verified model's fitting, robustness and predictive abilities (calculated by means of quality measurement summarised in Table 1, [41][42][43][44][45][46]) meet the required criteria and, therefore, also proves the model's quality. The Yscrambling procedure (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 1 Quality measures for QSAR models [41][42][43][44][45][46] Goodness of fit Robustness Predictive ability…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Q 2 value takes care of the statistical significance of the model since it is calculated by using the LOO predicted values of the training set compounds that are generated during each leave-one-out (LOO) cross validated cycle. Furthermore, the 2 m r metrics 38 were calculated for describing the performed internal (LOO) validation. Equations (1) and (2) give the formulae for computing the 2 m r metrics.…”
Section: Validation Of the Qspr Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%