2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2005.01.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Further explorations of Skyrme–Hartree–Fock–Bogoliubov mass formulas. IV: Neutron-matter constraint

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
122
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 116 publications
(130 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
8
122
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The recent Skxs15, Skxs20, and Skxs25 Skyrme interactions [54] represent a reasonable variation of neutron-skin thickness in 208 Pb [52], with T = 0.15, 0.20, and 0.25 fm, respectively, and all have K = 200 MeV. We also compare to results with the widely used Sly4 interaction [55] (K = 230 MeV and T = 0.16 fm) and with the Bsk9 interaction [56] obtained from a recent global fit to binding energies together with the Friedman-Pandharipande prediction for P n (K = 230 MeV and T = 0.16 fm). The variation of the R s values is dominated by the different single-particle radii obtained from these Skyrme interactions that affects the single-particle cross sections as shown in Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The recent Skxs15, Skxs20, and Skxs25 Skyrme interactions [54] represent a reasonable variation of neutron-skin thickness in 208 Pb [52], with T = 0.15, 0.20, and 0.25 fm, respectively, and all have K = 200 MeV. We also compare to results with the widely used Sly4 interaction [55] (K = 230 MeV and T = 0.16 fm) and with the Bsk9 interaction [56] obtained from a recent global fit to binding energies together with the Friedman-Pandharipande prediction for P n (K = 230 MeV and T = 0.16 fm). The variation of the R s values is dominated by the different single-particle radii obtained from these Skyrme interactions that affects the single-particle cross sections as shown in Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The polaron energy follows from the energy density (3) by E pol = (∂E/∂ρ ↓ ) ρ ↓ =0 . Figure 3 shows the predic-tions for E pol of various state-of-the-art nuclear density functionals: SIII [49], SGII [50], SkM * [51], SLy4 and SLy5 [12], SkO and SkO [52], BSk9 [53], SAMi [54], as well as the Gogny D1N functional [13]. All functionals predict an attractive polaron energy, but E pol varies greatly among the different functionals and is generally underestimated.…”
Section: This Is Equivalent To the Dyson Equationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Today, there exists a large variety of Skyrme parameter sets [57]. For our work we chose two representative approaches for Skyrme models, BSk8 and SLy4 [58,59], which are applied in astrophysical and nuclear physics studies. Both models are fitted to reproduce properties of neutron rich nuclei and nuclear matter at saturation density.…”
Section: Maximum Neutron Star Massesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For a RMF model with n 0 = 0.17 fm −3 and K 0 = 220 MeV, we arrive at m * /m = (0.53 − 0.65) for n ∼ (2 − 3) n 0 while for K 0 = 250 MeV we obtain m * /m = (0.54 − 0.67) for the same density range. Other schemes, such as BSk8 [58], SLy4 [59] or NL3 [66], produce nucleon potentials which are more repulsive than the Skyrme benchmark in the density region of interest. Therefore, we find that while the BSk8, SLy4, and NL3 parametrizations are fitted to nuclear matter at saturation density they are not applicable for higher values of n ∼ (2 − 3)n 0 .…”
Section: Maximum Neutron Star Massesmentioning
confidence: 99%