Further exploration of Filipino personality structure using the lexical approach: do the big-five or big-seven dimensions emerge?

Church, A. Timothy; Katigbak, Marcia S.; Reyes, Jose Alberto S.

doi:10.1002/(sici)1099-0984(199807/08)12:4<249::aid-per312>3.0.co;2-t

Cited by 71 publications

(72 citation statements)

References 32 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The second and the third seem related to Emotional Stability and Psychoticism. The last topic has no clear interpretation considering the reference models BenetMartinez & Waller, 1997;Church et al, 1998;Goldberg & Rosolack, 1994;Saucier, 2003). This way, the semantic analyses suggested that the Seven-Topic Model is not similar to other models with seven dimensions found in the literature.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 92%

See 1 more Smart Citation

The Personality Lexicon in Brazilian Portuguese: Studies with Natural Language

Peres¹

2018

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

iv Procura da poesia (...) Chega mais perto e contempla as palavras.Cada uma tem mil faces secretas sob a face neutra e te pergunta, sem interesse pela resposta, pobre ou terrível, que lhe deres:Trouxeste a chave? (...) Carlos Drummond de Andrade in A Rosa do Povo (1945) From March 1979Tired of all who come with words, words but no language I went to the snow-covered island.The wild does not have words.The unwritten pages spread out on all sides! I come upon the tracks of roe deer in the snow.Language but no words. Tomas Tranströmer in The Wild Market Square (1983, trad. Robin Fulton) v DedicatoryThis dissertation is dedicated to Professor Jacob Laros and to Professor Luiz Pasquali, who advised me during my postgraduate studies with inspiring wisdom, not only embracing my projects, but also kindly respecting my ideas and decisions, and patiently guiding me through my doubts and after my stumbles. It is an honor to be an apprentice and a friend of such masters.vi Agradecimentos (Acknowledgements)Um doutoramento não é resultado apenas da dedicação individual do estudante. Nesse sentido, faço os seguintes agradecimentos. À Renata e ao Bartholomeu, pelo amor e companheirismo. Aos meus pais, que sempre se esforçaram para oferecer aos filhos e a outros familiares oportunidades para o desenvolvimento educacional e profissional. Aos meus irmãos, cunhados e ao restante da minha grande e querida família mineira. À Thaís, Dudu e Raphael, a quem espero inspirar em seguir a carreira acadêmica. Aos meus professores da Educação Básica, que me ensinaram a aprender e inspiraram minha predileção pela ciência, artes e filosofia. Gostaria de lembrar especialmente das professoras Laudiene, Eliana, Magda Table 3. The Six-Topic Model with the 10 most relevant terms of the topics, reliability and presumed correspondence with other psycholexical models ……………………………………………………………..……….… 127 Table 4. The Seven-Topic Model with the 10 most relevant terms of the topics, reliability and presumed correspondence with other psycholexical models ……………………………………………………….… 128 Table 5. The Fourteen-Topic Model with the 10 most relevant terms of the topics, reliability and presumed correspondence with other psycholexical models ………………………………………………………… 130 Table 6. The Fifteen-Topic Model with the 10 most relevant terms of the topics, reliability and presumed correspondence with other psycholexical models …………………………………………………………. 132 Table 7. User frequency or the number of users that used the term, overall term frequency in the corpus, inverse document frequency, mean, minimum, maximum, and range …………………………..… 147xii General AbstractThis dissertation consists of three studies concerning the lexical approach of research in the field of personality, with a focus on Brazilian culture and natural language. The first study is of a theoretical nature and explores some of the criticisms regarding the lexical approach to personality research with its origin in the psychological study of natural language and crosscultural psychology, as well as methodolo...

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 92%

“…To analyze the semantic content of this topic, we compared it with other seven-factor models Benet-Martinez & Waller, 1997;Church et al, 1998;Saucier, 2003) and with the Big Five (Goldberg & Rosolack, 1994).…”

Section: Seven-topic Modelmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Personality Lexicon in Brazilian Portuguese: Studies with Natural Language

Peres¹

2018

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…A large number of indigenous personality measures have been developed in the Philippines, although only a few measure a fairly comprehensive set of traits or dimensions (Guanzon-Lapeña et al, 1998). In one series of studies (e.g., see Church, Katigbak, & Reyes, 1998), we obtained Filipinos' ratings of their own personalities using large sets of trait adjectives from the lexical studies referred to earlier. Factor analyses of these responses in several samples have indicated that six substantive dimensions provide a rather comprehensive and replicable representation of Filipino personality structure based on the lexical approach.…”

Section: Do Filipinos Use Traits In Describing or Understanding Persomentioning

confidence: 99%

Studying Personality Traits Across Cultures: Philippine Examples

Church¹,

Katigbak²

2002

Online Readings in Psychology and Culture

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…For example, Church, Katigbak, & Reyes, (1998) extracted and replicated seven personality factors within samples of Filipino college students. These authors found a Negative-Valence dimension through use of positive and negative-evaluation terms, and identified a multidimensional term (Temperamentalness and Self-assurance) that was moderately correlated with Neuroticism.…”

Section: The Ffm and Cross-cultural Researchmentioning

confidence: 99%

Racial and Gender Differences in the Five Factors of Personality within Military Samples

Johnson¹

2001

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The public reportinq burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, qathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection ^information including suggestions for reducing the burden, to Department of Defense, Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information SPONSORING/MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES)Office of Naval Research 800 N. Quincy Street Arlington, VA 22302 PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NUMBERRSP 00-7 SPONSOR/MONITOR'S ACRONYM(S) ONR SPONSOR/MONITOR'S REPORT NUMBER(S)N/A DISTRIBUTION/AVAILABILITY STATEMENTApproved for public release; distribution unlimited. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES ABSTRACTThis project assessed racial and gender differences on responses to the NEO-PI-R, the major instrument for measuring the five factors of personality. Theoretical rationale and empirical research is provided regarding possible personality differences between groups. Members of the Armed Services completed the NEO-PI-R resulting in a total sample of 472 (293 males, 179 females; 222 African Americans, 250 Whites). Multiple analysis of variance with race and gender as factors and age as a covariate (MANCOVA) demonstrated that African Americans scored higher than Whites on the factor of Agreeableness (p< .003 and lower on the factor of Negative Emotionality (p< .0001). Females scored higher on Agreeableness (p_< .0001), Negative Emotionality (p< .006), and Openness to Experience (p_< .0001) than males. A significant interaction effect emerged for Agreeableness (p< .03^, with White males scoring lower than White females and African-American males and females. Univariate F tests indicated significant racial differences for twelve (out of thirty) of the facet scales and gender differences were significant for ten of the facet scales. Within the context that this research is comparative, not causal, possible interpretations of between-group differences, applicability of the findings to organizational settings, and implications for universality are discussed. SUBJECT TERMS Racial and Gender Differences in the Five Factors of Personality within Military Samples AbstractThis project assessed racial and gender differences on responses to the NEO-PI-R, the major instrument for measuring the five factors of personality. Theoretical rationale and empirical research is provided regarding possible personality differences between groups. Members across all branches of the Armed Services completed the NEO-PI-R resulting in a total sample of 472 (293 males, 179 females; 222 African Americans, 250 Whites). Multiple analysis of variance with race and gender as factors and age as a covariate (MANCOVA) demonstrated that African Americans scored higher than Whites on the factor of Agreeableness (p_ <.003 and lower on the factor of Negative Emotionality (p < .0001). Females sc...

show abstract

Further exploration of Filipino personality structure using the lexical approach: do the big-five or big-seven dimensions emerge?

Cited by 71 publications

References 32 publications

The Personality Lexicon in Brazilian Portuguese: Studies with Natural Language

The Personality Lexicon in Brazilian Portuguese: Studies with Natural Language

Studying Personality Traits Across Cultures: Philippine Examples

Racial and Gender Differences in the Five Factors of Personality within Military Samples

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About