Further exploration of anti-realist intuitions about aesthetic judgment

Abstract

Experimental philosophy of aesthetics has explored to what extent ordinary people are committed to aesthetic realism. Extant work has focused on attitudes to normativism -a key commitment of realist positions in aesthetics -the claim that aesthetic judgments/statements have correctness conditions, invariant between subjects, such that there is a fact of the matter in cases of aesthetic disagreement. The emerging picture is that ordinary people strongly and almost universally reject normativism and thus there is no strong realist tendency in ordinary people's thinking about the aesthetic. This has been taken to dissolve the traditional puzzle in aesthetics of how to best account for the fact that (a) aesthetic judgments seem intersubjectively valid, while (b) aesthetic experience seems subjective. This paper presents studies which further enrich our understanding of ordinary thinking about the aesthetic: ordinary thinking about the aesthetic may not be so vehement in its rejection of normativism; and where previous results suggested that, in many cultures, the dominant trend is to reject correctness conditions for aesthetic judgments, the current results suggest participants think aesthetic judgments have correctness conditions (albeit perhaps very finely relativized to specific circumstances of judgment).

Aesthetic Disagreement with Oneself as Another

“…However, even when we look at the empirical evidence and intrasubjective disagreement in particular, things are more complicated than judgements. 29 In fact, the briefer the period over which the agent changes her mind, the more inclined are people to think that the agent might have made an error either before or after the change. This pushed Andow to speculate that perhaps the correctness conditions of aesthetic judgements are relativized to very fine-grained circumstances.…”