Further Experiments to Investigate the Influence of Robot Motions on Human Impressions

Hanajima, Naohiko; Ohta, Youhei; Sakurai, Yuusuke; Hikita, Hiromitsu; Yamashita, Masataka

doi:10.1109/roman.2006.314488

Cited by 2 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 12 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The perception of safety improved when the participants had previous experience of the same task [22,23,32,37,38], and/or when they had been previously informed about the robot safety features [32,35]. According to the results reported in [45], gender does not seem to play any role in the perception of safety, while extrovert participants tend to approach the robot at a closer distance.…”

Section: Achieving Perceived Safety For Industrial Manipulatorsmentioning

confidence: 87%

“…Industrial manipulators constitute the type of robot on which the largest number of papers were written on perceived safety in pHRI. Earlier works used standard industrial manipulators, and precisely CRS A460 [20,21,[23][24][25], Mitsubishi Movemaster RM-501 [18,19,22], ABB IRB-120 [29,31], Comau SMART SiX [27], Yaskawa MOTOMAN-K10S and SONY SRX-410 [28]. More recent papers, instead, started using collaborative robots: KUKA LBR iiwa [35,38,43], Kinova MICO [33], UR3 [44], UR5 [39], UR10, [30], Sawyer [45], and Franka Emika Panda [42].…”

Section: Overview On Industrial Manipulatorsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The human attitude toward robot position and approach direction was studied in [18,25]. Finally, the effect of visibility/audibility of the robot by the human subjects were analyzed in [18,22].…”

Section: Overview On Industrial Manipulatorsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The reason is that this experiment duration was enough to allow researchers to study people's reactions, as well as to test new assessment methods. The exception was constituted by studies such as [22,73,77], which ran longer experiments, within a time span of up to two months, in order to assess the effects of long-term habituation of the human subjects to the interaction with the robot. Experiments were conducted in (i) research laboratories, (ii) factories, (iii) locations close to the living environments of the participants, (iv) fairs and symposia and, finally, (v) virtual environments and driving simulators.…”

Section: Experiments Duration and Locationmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Perceived Safety in Physical Human Robot Interaction -- A Survey

Rubagotti¹,

Tusseyeva²,

Baltabayeva³

et al. 2021

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This review paper focuses on different aspects of perceived safety for a number of autonomous physical systems. This is a major aspect of robotics research, as more and more applications allow human and autonomous systems to share their space, with crucial implications both on safety and on its perception. The alternative terms used to express related concepts (e.g., psychological safety, trust, comfort, stress, fear, and anxiety) are listed and explained. Then, the available methods to assess perceived safety (i.e., questionnaires, physiological measurements, behavioral assessment, and direct input devices) are described. Six categories of autonomous systems are considered (industrial manipulators, mobile robots, mobile manipulators, humanoid robots, drones, and autonomous vehicles), providing an overview of the main themes related to perceived safety in the specific domain, a description of selected works, and an analysis of how motion and characteristics of the system influence the perception of safety. The survey also discusses experimental duration and location of the reviewed papers as well as identified trends over time.

show abstract

Section: Achieving Perceived Safety For Industrial Manipulatorsmentioning

confidence: 87%

Section: Overview On Industrial Manipulatorsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Overview On Industrial Manipulatorsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Experiments Duration and Locationmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Perceived Safety in Physical Human Robot Interaction -- A Survey

Rubagotti¹,

Tusseyeva²,

Baltabayeva³

et al. 2021

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Benchmarking Teamwork of Humans and Cobots—An Overview of Metrics, Strategies, and Tasks

2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Human-robot teaming receives an ever-increasing level of attention in research, development and industry. Novel approaches to task sharing in hybrid teams range from optimized schedules to intelligent cobot assistants with a high degree of autonomy. These approaches must prove their usefulness and benefits compared to manual work or full automation -particularly when it comes to assessing their potential for productive industrial use. This leverages demand for standardized, repeatable benchmarks to compare approaches and measure improvements in a reproducible way. Designing such benchmarks is challenging as numerous aspects, from safety considerations to human factors and team performance, must be considered. This survey seeks to contribute to the future development of benchmarks for the field of collaborative assembly, handling, and industrial cobot applications by giving a comprehensive overview of relevant metrics, evaluation strategies, and tasks for human-robot teams.

show abstract

Further Experiments to Investigate the Influence of Robot Motions on Human Impressions

Cited by 2 publications

References 12 publications

Perceived Safety in Physical Human Robot Interaction -- A Survey

Perceived Safety in Physical Human Robot Interaction -- A Survey

Benchmarking Teamwork of Humans and Cobots—An Overview of Metrics, Strategies, and Tasks

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About