2019
DOI: 10.1002/gcc.22728
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Further evidence that full gene deletions of DICER1 predispose to DICER1 syndrome

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This lowers the odds of all events coinciding and could explain the low penetrance of DICER1 syndrome 34 . Exceptions to this model include pineoblastomas, where loss‐of‐heterozygosity (LOH) is frequently found in the second allele, 40,41 individuals with de novo germline DICER1 variants 42 or with large germline deletions 43‐46 and DICER1 mosaics 34,47,48 …”
Section: Dicer1 Function Dicer1 Syndrome and Molecular Geneticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This lowers the odds of all events coinciding and could explain the low penetrance of DICER1 syndrome 34 . Exceptions to this model include pineoblastomas, where loss‐of‐heterozygosity (LOH) is frequently found in the second allele, 40,41 individuals with de novo germline DICER1 variants 42 or with large germline deletions 43‐46 and DICER1 mosaics 34,47,48 …”
Section: Dicer1 Function Dicer1 Syndrome and Molecular Geneticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While most individuals with DICER1 syndrome are heterozygous for a germline loss‐of‐function DICER1 pathogenic variant, other predisposing DICER1 alterations have also been documented. These include deletion of the entire DICER1 locus (de Kock, Geoffrion, et al, ; de Kock et al, ; Herriges et al, ; van Engelen et al, ), in‐ and out‐of‐frame intragenic deletions involving one or more exons (Apellaniz‐Ruiz et al, ; Brenneman et al, ; Sabbaghian et al, ), and somatic mosaicism, which is observed in a small fraction of syndromic patients (Brenneman et al, ; de Kock et al, ; Klein et al, ). Individuals with mosaicism for loss‐of‐function mutations tend to exhibit one or two foci of disease; in contrast, mosaicism for RNase IIIb hotspot mutations results in a greater number of disease foci at significantly younger ages than is typical (Brenneman et al, ; de Kock et al, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only a few children with SLCT and thyroid pathology, with or without associating genitourinary ERMS, has been reported to date. [6][7][8][9][10][11] Our patient developed embryonal RMS of the cervix and was treated by endoscopic surgery and chemotherapy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%