Further evidence on the similarity of memory processes in the process dissociation procedure and in source monitoring

Steffens, Melanie C.; Buchner, Axel; Martensen, Heike; Erdfelder, Edgar

doi:10.3758/bf03211816

Cited by 24 publications

(26 citation statements)

References 57 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Indeed, some ERP research has suggested that late frontal ERP old/new effects are related to recollection (e.g., Allan et al, 1998;Curran et al, 2001). Relating frontal activity to both source memory (as was noted above) and recollection is consistent with Jacoby's (1991) process dissociation procedure that assumes source memory to be diagnostic of recollection (Buchner, Erdfelder, Steffens, & Martensen, 1997;Mulligan & Hirshman, 1997;Steffens, Buchner, Martensen, & Erdfelder, 2000;Yu & Bellezza, 2000). Broadly speaking, we agree with the notion that frontal mechanisms contribute to source recollection.…”

supporting

confidence: 77%

“…Assuming that late frontal ERP effects are indeed related to recollection, our results suggest that the recollective aspect of memory for time depends on context reconstruction but that recollection of contextual details may not always be necessary for placing events in time. Thus, when list discrimination ability is used as a measure of recollection (e.g., Buchner et al, 1997;Jacoby, 1991;Mulligan & Hirshman, 1997;Steffens et al, 2000;Yu & Bellezza, 2000), it would be advisable to arrange conditions so that they foster reconstructive over strength-based discrimination between lists.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Differentiating location- and distance-based processes in memory for time: An ERP study

Curran

Friedman

2003

Psychonomic Bulletin & Review

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Memory for the time of events may benefit from reconstructive, location-based, and distance-based processes, but these processes are difficult to dissociate with behavioral methods. Neuropsychological research has emphasized the contribution of prefrontal brain mechanisms to memory for time but has not clearly differentiated location-from distance-based processing. The present experiment recorded event-related brain potentials (ERPs) while subjects completed two different temporal memory tests, designed to emphasize either location-or distance-based processing. The subjects' reports of locationbased versus distance-based strategies and the reaction time pattern validated our experimental manipulation. Late (800-1,800 msec) frontal ERP effects were related to location-based processing. The results provide support for a two-process theory of memory for time and suggest that frontal memory mechanisms are specifically related to reconstructive, location-based processing.

show abstract

supporting

confidence: 77%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Differentiating location- and distance-based processes in memory for time: An ERP study

Curran

Friedman

2003

Psychonomic Bulletin & Review

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Successful exclusion depends in part on remembering source-the spatial, temporal, or perceptual context in which one encounters a particular item (e.g., Buchner, Steffens, Erdfelder, & Rothkegel, 1997;Graf & Komatsu, 1994;Mulligan & Hirshman, 1997;Roediger & McDermott, 1994;Steffens, Buchner, Martensen, & Erdfelder, 2000;Verfaellie & Treadwell, 1993). For example, in the list discrimination PDP paradigm, participants must remember not only a target, but also the list from which the target came.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Neuropsychological correlates of recollection and familiarity in normal aging

Davidson

Glisky

2002

Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience

130

108

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The dual-process model of recognition memory proposed by Jacoby (1991; see also Mandler, 1980) postulates the existence of two independent components of recognition memory: a conscious retrieval process (recollection) and an automatic component ( familiarity). Older adults appear to be impaired in recollection, but findings with respect to familiarity have been mixed. Studies of the brain bases of these components, using neurological patients, have also been inconclusive. We examined recollection and familiarity, using the process dissociation procedure, in older adults characterized on the basis of both their frontal and their medial temporal lobe function. Findings suggest that only some older adults, depending on their neuropsychological status, are impaired in recollection and/or familiarity: Recollection seems to involve both frontal and medial temporal lobe function, whereas familiarity appears to be dependent only on function associated with the medial temporal lobes.

show abstract

“…If the model is valid, each experimental manipulation should selectively affect the parameter of interest, but not others. This approach has found widespread use in cognitive psychology (Bayen, Murnane, & Erdfelder, 1996;Buchner, Erdfelder, Steffens, & Martensen, 1997;Buchner, Erdfelder, & Vaterrodt-Plünnecke, 1995;Chechile & Meyer, 1976;Erdfelder & Buchner, 1998;Klauer, Stahl, & Erdfelder, 2007;Klauer & Wegener, 1998;Nadarevic & Erdfelder, 2011;Steffens, Buchner, Martensen, & Erdfelder, 2000). To our knowledge, however, a test of the GCM's validity has not been attempted so far.…”

Section: A Validation Study Of the General Condorcet Modelmentioning

confidence: 99%

CAML—Maximum likelihood consensus analysis

Aßfalg

Erdfelder

2011

Behav Res

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Consensus analysis enables estimation of individual differences in competencies and response tendencies when answer keys to dichotomous forced-choice questions are unknown. CAML, a set of functions written in R, implements maximum likelihood estimation for the general Condorcet model that underlies consensus analysis. CAML avoids problems of alternative approaches that have often rendered consensus analysis impractical or unfeasible in the past. It provides (1) measures of model fit, (2) a measure of consensus, (3) point and interval estimates of competencies and response tendencies, and (4) an estimate of the unknown answer key. The present article describes the general Condorcet model, the CAML algorithms, and the handling of the software. In addition, the validity of CAML results is tested in a recognition memory study using selective experimental manipulations of the parameters. The results show that CAML works very well in practice and provides valid estimates of competencies, response tendencies, and answer keys.

show abstract

Further evidence on the similarity of memory processes in the process dissociation procedure and in source monitoring

Cited by 24 publications

References 57 publications

Differentiating location- and distance-based processes in memory for time: An ERP study

Differentiating location- and distance-based processes in memory for time: An ERP study

Neuropsychological correlates of recollection and familiarity in normal aging

CAML—Maximum likelihood consensus analysis

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About