2001
DOI: 10.1029/2000jd900522
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Further evidence of total ozone variation during the solar eclipse of 1995

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The undulations observed in columnar ozone concentration are of significant amplitude. The similar kinds of undulations were also reported in literature [ Mims and Mims , 1993; Chakrabarty et al , 1997, 2001]. The similar variation in ground‐reaching UV radiation is expected due to increase and decrease in total columnar ozone.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The undulations observed in columnar ozone concentration are of significant amplitude. The similar kinds of undulations were also reported in literature [ Mims and Mims , 1993; Chakrabarty et al , 1997, 2001]. The similar variation in ground‐reaching UV radiation is expected due to increase and decrease in total columnar ozone.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…In fact, the most efficient reactions involving ozone are driven by solar radiation [ Finlayson‐Pitts and Pitts , 2000; Seinfeld and Pandis , 2006]. The effects of a solar eclipse on the total ozone column have been widely studied by various groups [ Bojkov , 1968; Mims and Mims , 1993; Chakrabarty et al , 1997, 2001; Zerefos et al , 2000; Kazadzis et al , 2007; Zerefos et al , 2000 and references therein]. A series of fluctuations in the column ozone was observed following the totality of eclipse preceded with reduced amplitude [ Mims and Mims , 1993].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Winkler et al (2001) reported contradicting results from Brewer and Microtops ozone measurements at Hohenpeissenberg during the total solar eclipse of 11 August 1999. Chakrabarty et al (2001) suggested that the observed ozone variability over India during the eclipse of 24 October 1995 could not be explained by the variations in the rates of conventional photochemical and dynamical processes or by the formation of gravity waves during the eclipse.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During another eclipse of 87% totality, Elansky and Elokhov [1993] measured a 55% ± 6% increase in NO 2 VCD using zenith‐sky visible spectroscopy. Chakrabarty et al [2001] found that NO 2 slant column densities (SCDs) measured by a visible spectrometer approximately doubled and identified a wavelike structure in the NO 2 measurements. They suggested that the latter effect was related to eclipse‐induced gravity waves.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%