1984
DOI: 10.1007/bf00137460
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Further evidence for the presence of meiotic pairing control genes in Alopecurus L. (Gramineae)

Abstract: Mathematical equations applied to data on the meiotic chromosome behaviour of diploid, triploid and tetraploid Alopecurus species, their hybrids and synthesised autopolyploids confirm that chromosome pairing among homologues does not occur at random. The genotypic control of preferential bivalent formation is demonstrated and its role in natural populations discussed.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
(18 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Until hybrids are made between species at different ploidy levels andan absence ofmultivalent formation is demonstrated in such hybrids, we cannot be completely sure whether these are auto-or aUopolyploids. Many recent studies have shown that bivalent-forming polyploids (i.e., allopolyploids), when crossed with diploid relatives will form high frequencies of multivalents, indicating that they are in fact autopolyploids with bivalent promoting or pairing control genes (Vida 1970; Thomas & Murray 1983;Murray et al 1984). Thus, some caution is needed at this stage.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Until hybrids are made between species at different ploidy levels andan absence ofmultivalent formation is demonstrated in such hybrids, we cannot be completely sure whether these are auto-or aUopolyploids. Many recent studies have shown that bivalent-forming polyploids (i.e., allopolyploids), when crossed with diploid relatives will form high frequencies of multivalents, indicating that they are in fact autopolyploids with bivalent promoting or pairing control genes (Vida 1970; Thomas & Murray 1983;Murray et al 1984). Thus, some caution is needed at this stage.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Gupta and Fedak, 1985), or Alopecurus spp. (Murray et al, 1984). Several examples of chromosome associations in allo-and autopolyploids from the Poaceae family are shown in Figure 2.…”
Section: Chromosome-pairing Regulators In Other Poaceae Taxamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is particularly clear in the extreme example when each chromosome can form only a single crossover, in which case only bivalents can persist to metaphase. This is further supported by the observation that lower crossover rates in diploids correlate with increased meiotic stability of the neopolyploids derived from them, where diploids with low crossover rates are effectively preadapted for polyploid success (e.g., see Murray et al 1984;Srivastava et al 1992;Jenczewski et al 2002). In autotetraploid Arabidopsis arenosa, selection after WGD acted on genes encoding structural proteins important for the formation of chromosome axes, crossover designation, and synapsis, suggesting that this reflects a coordinated multigenic shift in meiosis that reduces crossing over (Hollister et al 2012;Yant et al 2013).…”
Section: Chromosomal Instability (Cin)mentioning
confidence: 76%