2003
DOI: 10.1002/pola.10718
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Further evidence for the inseparability of the theoretical enthalpic terminal and penultimate unit effects in the radical copolymerization of styrene with acrylonitrile

Abstract: The theoretical enthalpies of propagation reactions at 0 K without zeropoint vibrational energy corrections according to terminal and penultimate models of the radical copolymerization of styrene with acrylonitrile are reported from molecular orbital calculations at the following levels of theory and basis sets: HF/6-31G(d); B3-LYP/6-31G(d); B3-LYP/6-311G(d,p) and B3-LYP/6-311ϩG(3df)//6-311G(d,p). Both the enthalpic terminal and penultimate unit effects, determined according to the theoretical thermochemistry,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because of the size of the studied systems, all calculations were performed at a relatively low theory level, namely, the B3-LYP/6-31G(d). Nevertheless, as it was shown previously, 26 dependencies of the reaction enthalpies on the theory level and basis set form almost parallel curves the differences between enthalpic effects for elementary propagation reactions within the same kinetic model and can be satisfactory shown by performing calculations at an even relatively lower level of theory.…”
Section: Computational Proceduressupporting
confidence: 75%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Because of the size of the studied systems, all calculations were performed at a relatively low theory level, namely, the B3-LYP/6-31G(d). Nevertheless, as it was shown previously, 26 dependencies of the reaction enthalpies on the theory level and basis set form almost parallel curves the differences between enthalpic effects for elementary propagation reactions within the same kinetic model and can be satisfactory shown by performing calculations at an even relatively lower level of theory.…”
Section: Computational Proceduressupporting
confidence: 75%
“…Δ H term0 and (Δ H pen0 were calculated as the difference between the enthalpy of addition of a given monomer to growing radical with A (S–A system) or M (S–M system) and S as the terminal and penultimate units, respectively. Results calculated at the B3‐LYP/6‐31G(d) level of theory without ZPE energies for reactions in the gas phase at 0 K (kilocalories per mole) (data for S–A monomer system published previously26). Terminal model: (▾) CH 3 ‐S · + S → CH 3 ‐S‐S · and CH 3 ‐A · + S → CH 3 ‐A‐S ·; CH 3 ‐S · + S → CH 3 ‐S‐S · and CH 3 ‐M · + S → CH 3 ‐M‐S · (▴) CH 3 ‐S · + A → CH 3 ‐S‐A · and CH 3 ‐A · + A → CH 3 ‐A‐A ·; CH 3 ‐S · + M → CH 3 ‐S‐M · and CH 3 ‐M · + M → CH 3 ‐M‐M ·.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The influence of the basis set on thermochemistry was investigated for the B3LYP method for which the impact of two basis sets—a medium size basis set 6–31G(d) and a large 6–311+G(3df, 2p) one—on the calculated enthalpies were compared. The comparison was performed to verify previous conclusions from thermochemical studies performed on the same monomer system, namely, that the dependencies of enthalpic effects on the basis sets form parallel curves within the same copolymerization Mayo–Lewis kinetic model and, therefore, they can be compared, at least qualitatively, within the set of elementary propagation reactions for the given comonomer system 27. Optionally, theoretical calculations with the Gaussian deliver data on electronic structures and vibrational frequencies for the optimized molecular structures that, after scaling,28 are usually used29 to obtain thermochemical and thermodynamic quantities, including the enthalpy of reaction and change of entropy.…”
Section: Theoreticalmentioning
confidence: 91%