TX 75083-3836, U.S.A., fax 01-972-952-9435.
AbstractProppant selection in hydraulic fracturing is a critical economic and technical decision that affects stimulation and field development economics. In many cases the selection is based on laboratory data from standardized API conductivity tests on clean packs at specified stress and temperature. These tests predict conductivities that are optimistic compared to observed field performance. Often a laboratory measured conductivity difference of only 5-10% is considered a significant variance when applied to the producing life of a well. The significance of these small differences, however, is often overwhelmed by other factors affecting fracture performance in the field.The selection of a particular proppant should be based on an identifiable difference in performance under field conditions. This requires an accurate assessment of all the damage mechanisms that can and do occur during fracturing and their impact on final conductivity. This paper outlines the primary damage mechanisms and their effect on conductivity, fracture cleanup and ultimate stimulation response. The expected variance in laboratory measurements of conductivity is also quantified.