1951
DOI: 10.2118/951145-g
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Further Developments in the Laboratory Determination of Relative Permeability

Abstract: An earlier publication has discussed three methods for obtaining relativepermeability data on small core samples and the apparatus and technique for thecapillary pressure displacement method. This paper describes the apparatus andtechnique for the solution gas and the dynamic displacement methods andpresents a routine procedure for obtaining oil-gas and water-oil relativepermeability data. Theoretical and experimental considerations are presented to show that theend effect commonly associated… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However work by Botset (1940) showed saturation gradients exist along the core, caused by a capillary discontinuity that exists at the outlet boundary of the core (Leverett 1941;Hassler et al 1944; Richardson et al 1952). As relative permeability is a nonlinear function of saturation, spatially varying relative permeability values and associated nonlinear phase pressure gradients are evident, and are generically referred to as the end effect (Caudle et al 1951). The importance of these effects was apparent to early investigators who related the flowrate dependency of effective relative permeability to the end effect (Leas et al 1950; Caudle et al 1951;Geffen et al 1951; Osoba et al 1951; Richardson et al 1952; Rapoport and Leas 1953;Richardson 1957; Kyte and Leas 1958).…”
Section: Dependency On Boundary Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However work by Botset (1940) showed saturation gradients exist along the core, caused by a capillary discontinuity that exists at the outlet boundary of the core (Leverett 1941;Hassler et al 1944; Richardson et al 1952). As relative permeability is a nonlinear function of saturation, spatially varying relative permeability values and associated nonlinear phase pressure gradients are evident, and are generically referred to as the end effect (Caudle et al 1951). The importance of these effects was apparent to early investigators who related the flowrate dependency of effective relative permeability to the end effect (Leas et al 1950; Caudle et al 1951;Geffen et al 1951; Osoba et al 1951; Richardson et al 1952; Rapoport and Leas 1953;Richardson 1957; Kyte and Leas 1958).…”
Section: Dependency On Boundary Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Investigators often recommend high viscous pressure gradients when using steady-state core flooding experiments to calculate effective relative permeability as a means to reduce the saturation gradients caused by capillary end effects(Leas et al 1950;Caudle et al 1951;Geffen et al 1951;Osoba et al 1951;Richardson et al 1952; …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The impact of the high wetting phase saturation and its generation is described by several authors. [11][12][13] While these end-effects are usually only considered important in laboratory systems, they are important in any cases where capillary forces are large and pressure gradients are small. Holditch noted that the combination of relative permeability and capillary forces in a low permeability reservoir system, with small pore-size distribution, can result in a severe reduction in post-frac deliverability.…”
Section: Gravity Segregation and Capillary Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Caudle, Slobod, Brownscombe (1951) Rock is confined by a rubber sleeve. Inlet and outlet ends of rock sample extend beyond pressure taps.…”
Section: Recommendation Of Methods For Salad0 Anhydritementioning
confidence: 99%