2012
DOI: 10.1155/2012/190641
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Further Clinical Validation of the Walking Impairment Questionnaire for Classification of Walking Performance in Patients with Peripheral Artery Disease

Abstract: The purpose of this study was to further validate the Walking Impairment Questionnaire (WIQ) as a self-report tool to aid in the clinical identification of walking ability of patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD). 132 patients with PAD and an ankle brachial index (ABI) ≤0.90 were enrolled; 123 provided complete data for the WIQ and standardized graded treadmill test. The WIQ scores were consistent with reported scores in other studies. The absolute claudication distance (ACD) ranged from 42.3 to 1589.2… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
29
0
3

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
(43 reference statements)
2
29
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The specific procedures for measuring CBV in LAD have been previously described by our laboratory and the reproducibility within subjects has been verified [2124]. Subjects also completed the walking impairment questionnaire (WIQ), a pen and paper test to evaluate walking performance that correlates to peak walking time and absolute claudication distance in PAD [25]. The WIQ contains 14 questions and each response is weighted based on the difficulty of the task; scores range from 0 to 100 with lower scores indicating worse walking ability (greater impairment).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The specific procedures for measuring CBV in LAD have been previously described by our laboratory and the reproducibility within subjects has been verified [2124]. Subjects also completed the walking impairment questionnaire (WIQ), a pen and paper test to evaluate walking performance that correlates to peak walking time and absolute claudication distance in PAD [25]. The WIQ contains 14 questions and each response is weighted based on the difficulty of the task; scores range from 0 to 100 with lower scores indicating worse walking ability (greater impairment).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sequence of tests was completely random. The cutoff point values for all tests (VAS, HADS, and PHQ-9) to identify different levels of depression were calculated using the sensitivity and specificity of at least 90% (14) and the results are reported in Table 2. The scores higher than 90% sensitivity were considered as the first level.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patients were asked to rate their depression during the past 2 weeks between lack of depression and severe depression on the line (14). It is a suitable tool to classify the level of depression and also screen patients with depression (9).…”
Section: Single-item Vasmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Responses are recorded on a 5-point Likert scale with options of none, slight, some, much, and very/unable. WIQ cut off scores appropriately classify walking performance (absolute claudication distance and peak walking time) assessed by a standardised graded treadmill test in people with PAD [81], and is a valid tool to detect improvement in daily walking ability in people with IC [82]. …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%