2021
DOI: 10.1093/glycob/cwab016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Further analyses of APRIL/APRIL-receptor/glycosaminoglycan interactions by biochemical assays linked to computational studies

Abstract: A proliferation-inducing ligand (APRIL) is a member of the tumor necrosis factor superfamily. APRIL is quite unique in this superfamily for at least for two reasons: i) it binds to glycosaminoglycans (GAGs) via its positively charged N-terminus; ii) one of its signaling receptor, the transmembrane activator CAML interactor (TACI) was also reported to bind GAGs. Here, as provided by biochemical evidences with the use of an APRIL deletion mutant linked to computational studies, APRIL-GAG interaction involved oth… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
17
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
2
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Five representative structures, which was found to be an appropriate number to avoid undersampling of docked solutions [39] , were chosen for each cluster of the docked structures obtained by molecular docking, and they were used as starting structures for molecular dynamics (MD) simulations. Additionally, simulations of the unbound SAA dimer and monomer were performed to elucidate a potential effect of GAG binding on the protein unfolding process.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Five representative structures, which was found to be an appropriate number to avoid undersampling of docked solutions [39] , were chosen for each cluster of the docked structures obtained by molecular docking, and they were used as starting structures for molecular dynamics (MD) simulations. Additionally, simulations of the unbound SAA dimer and monomer were performed to elucidate a potential effect of GAG binding on the protein unfolding process.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All MD simulations were performed in AMBER16 [33] with ff99SBonlysc parameters for proteins and GLYCAM06 [35] parameters for GAGs, respectively. The total length of each MD simulation was 25 ns, which is appropriate for this type of system according to our previous analysis [39] . For the SAA monomer alone and SAA monomer complexed with HP dp2, dp4, dp6 and dp8 complexes MD simulations have been further extended to 100 ns for the DSSP analysis.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Depending on their arrangement and sulfation pattern, those units may display 408 [ 4 ] variants, of which 202 are found in mammals [ 5 , 6 ]. Although GAG’s certain binding specificity has been observed in several biologically relevant systems [ 7 , 8 , 9 ], protein–GAG interactions are often predominantly electrostatics-driven, and their binding energies correlate with the GAG net charge [ 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 ]. Despite the fact that computational studies of GAGs persist as a general challenge due to the required conformational sampling and their periodicity, there are numerous successful studies on proteins complexes with shorter GAG oligosaccharides (of length up to octasaccharides) [ 1 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, a 24-mer and a 48-mer of heparin (HP) were docked to two complexes of a proliferation-inducing ligand (APRIL) protein and its receptors—the transmembrane activator and calcium modulator and cyclophilin ligand interactor (TACI) and the B cell maturation antigen (BCMA). APRIL is a member of the TNF superfamily [ 25 ] that was shown to bind GAGs (chondroitin sulfate and heparan sulfate) [ 13 , 26 , 27 , 28 ]. Such binding is thought to mediate APRIL’s oligomerization and, therefore, enable its role in cell signaling [ 29 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation