Furosemide does not reduce the incidence of postoperative acute kidney injury in adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery: A PRISMA‐compliant systematic review and meta‐analysis

Abstract

Objective Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a common complication of cardiac surgical patients, the occurrence of which is multifactorial. Furosemide is the most common loop diuretic and widely used in cardiac surgery to reduce fluid overload, increase tubular flow and urine output. It remains unknown whether furosemide affects the incidence or prognosis of cardiac surgery‐induced acute kidney injury (CS‐AKI). Therefore, the current study was performed to address this question. Methods PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases were searched for relevant studies. Primary outcomes of interest included postoperative CS‐AKI incidence, need for renal replacement therapy (RRT) rate. Secondary outcomes of interest included postoperative serum creatinine (Scr) and blood urea nitrogen (BUN) levels, postoperative mechanical ventilation duration (MVD), length of stay (LOS) in intensive care unit (ICU) and in hospital, and mortality. The odds ratio (OR) and/or the weighted mean difference (WMD) with 95% confidence interval (CI) were used to pool the data. Results Database search yielded six studies including 566 adult patients, and 283 patients were allocated into Group Furosemide and 283 into Group Control (Placebo). Heterogeneity between studies was deemed acceptable, and the publication bias was low. Meta‐analysis suggested that furosemide administration in adult cardiac surgical patients had no effect on CS‐AKI incidence (n = 4 trials; OR = 0.92; 95% CI: 0.37–2.30; p = .86; I2 = 57%) and need for RRT rate (n = 2 trials; OR = 4.13; 95% CI: 0.44–38.51; p = .21; I2 = 0%). Diversely, furosemide administration in adult cardiac surgical patients significantly decreased postoperative BUN level (n = 3 trials; WMD = 0.71; 95% CI: 0.10–1.33; p = .02; I2 = 0%), postoperative MVD (n = 2 trials; WMD = −3.13; 95% CI: −3.78 to −2.49; p < .00001; I2 = 0%) and postoperative LOS in ICU (n = 3 trials; WMD = −0.47; 95% CI: −0.76 to −0.18; p = .001; I2 = 0%). However, it had no significant impact on postoperative Scr level, postoperative LOS in hospital, and postoperative mortality. Conclusion This meta‐analysis suggested that furosemide administration in adult cardiac surgical patients had no significant effect on CS‐AKI incidence, need for RRT rate, postoperative Scr level, LOS in hospital and mortality, but could reduce postoperative BUN level, MVD, and LOS in ICU. As only a limited number of studies were included, these results should be interpreted carefully and cautiously. Future high‐quality randomized controlled trials are needed to define the role of furosemide in CS‐AKI prevention and management.