Fungsi Predikatif Intransitif Adjektiva Bahasa Indonesia

Abstract

Abstrak Mengidentifikasi fungsi sintaksis kelas kata dalam konstruksi Bahasa Indonesia (selanjutnya disebut BI) selalu menantang untuk dituntaskan mengingat tipisnya batasan antar fungsi sintaksis dimaksud. Terlebih lagi menentukan fungsi sintaksis adjektiva dalam konstruksi kalimat BI, tantangan yang akan dihadapi tidak hanya menentukan batasan fungsi yang tepat namun kecermatan mengidentifi-kasi dan memilah mana yang adjektiva dan mana yang verba statif. Berangkat dari latar belakang tersebut, makalah ini menyajikan hasil analisis fungsi sintaksis adjektiva pada sejumlah tipe-tipe klausa pada BI. Hasil analisis menunjukkan bahwa adjektiva sangat dominan berfungsi sebagai sub-jek (SUBJ) klausal, baik sebagai inti NP Subjek maupun sebagai pewatas pentaraf pada NP Subjek dan NP Objek Klausal. Hasil analisis juga menunjukkan bahwa dari sejumlah tipe-tipe klausal BI, klausa relatif dan klausa komplemen serta klausa kompleks adalah tiga jenis klausa BI yang didomi-nasi kemunculan adjektiva dalam fungsi sintaksis dominannya. Hasil analisis menyimpulkan bahwa fungsi sintaksis yang berterima pada suatu kelas kata dapat menjadi parameter penentu jenis kategori katanya. Kata kunci: pewatas pentaraf, inti, klausa relatif, komplemen Abstract Identifying classes syntactic function of words in Indonesian construction (hereinafter referred to as BI) is always challenging to be completed given the thin boundaries between syntactic function in question. Moreover, determining the syntactic function BI adjective in sentence construction, the challenges to be faced not only determine the limits of proper function, but the accuracy identify and sort out which ones adjectives and verbs which ones stand. Departing from this background, this paper presents the results of the analysis of syntactic function adjectives on the number and type clause in BI. The analysis showed that the dominant adjective serves as a subject (Subj) clause, either as a core subject NP as well as modifiers pentaraf the subject NP and NP Object clauses. The analysis also showed that the number and type of BI clauses, relative clauses and complement clauses and complex clauses are three types of clauses BI dominated the emergence of dominant adjective in syntactic function. The results of the analysis concluded that the syntactic function that is acceptable in a class of words can be a parameter determining the type of category he said.

Argument Bar Movement in Relative Clauses Produced by Bipa Students: An Analysis of Noam Chomsky’s Generative Transformation

“…The adjectives presented tended to be root words compared to their derivatives. Previous research suggested that the dominant syntactic function (predicate) clause tends to be filled by adjectives in the basic form rather than its derivative form (Umiyati, 2016). In English, such relative clause structures are not translated into relative clauses but become nouns (Dwijati et al, 2016).…”

Morphological Process in Balinese Adjectives

“…First, Umiyati (2014) wrote a dissertation entitled 'Grammatical Behavior of Indonesian Adjectives'. In her research, Umiyati analyzes Indonesian adjectives by describing syntax, semantics, and morphology aspects [4]. Then Budiarta (2014), in his writing entitled 'Balinese Adjectives', shows that Balinese adjectives can be combined with nouns to form noun phrases where the adjective function is derogatory [5].…”