Abstract:Cercospora species cause cercospora leaf blight (CLB) and purple seed stain (PSS) on soybean. Because there are few resistant soybean varieties available, CLB/PSS management relies heavily upon fungicide applications. Sensitivity of 62 Argentinian Cercospora isolates to demethylation inhibitor (DMI), methyl benzimidazole carbamate (MBC), quinone outside inhibitor (QoI), succinate dehydrogenase inhibitor (SDHI) fungicides, and mancozeb was determined in this study. All isolates were sensitive to difenoconazole,… Show more
“…The M. phaseolina 2013-1 strain was obtained from infected soybean roots grown in Pergamino, Buenos Aires, Argentina, as previously reported [ 13 ]. Cercospora nicotianae isolate Cn_2017_BOL34 was obtained from soybean leaves with Cercospora leaf blight symptoms sampled from commercial soybean fields in Santa Cruz, Bolivia in 2017 as previously reported [ 15 ]. The strain 17-5-1 of Colletotrichum truncatum was isolated from soybean leaves with anthracnose symptoms sampled from commercial soybean fields in Roldán, Santa Fe, Argentina in 2017.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fungi belonging to other genera such as Cercospora and Colletotrichum are causal agents of several diseases of soybean in Argentina and Brazil, which have also developed resistance or changes in sensitivity to commonly used fungicides [ 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 ].…”
Pseudomonas fluorescens 9 and Bacillus subtilis 54, proposed as biofungicides to control Macrophomina phaseolina, a dangerous pathogen of soybean and other crops, were grown in vitro to evaluate their ability to produce metabolites with antifungal activity. The aim of the manuscript was to identify the natural compounds responsible for their antifungal activity. Only the culture filtrates of P. fluorescens 9 showed strong antifungal activity against M. phaseolina. Its organic extract contained phenazine and mesaconic acid (1 and 2), whose antifungal activity was tested against M. phaseolina, as well as Cercospora nicotianae and Colletotrichum truncatum, other pathogens of soybean; however, only compound 1 exhibited activity. The antifungal activity of compound 1 was compared to phenazine-1-carboxylic acid (PCA, 3), 2-hydroxyphenazine (2-OH P, 4), and various semisynthetic phenazine nitro derivatives in order to perform a structure–activity relationship (SAR) study. PCA and phenazine exhibited the same percentage of growth inhibition in M. phaseolina and C. truncatum, whereas PCA (3) showed lower activity against C. nicotianae than phenazine. 2-Hydroxyphenazine (4) showed no antifungal activity against M. phaseolina. The results of the SAR study showed that electron attractor (COOH and NO2) or repulsor (OH) groups significantly affect the antifungal growth, as well as their α- or β-location on the phenazine ring. Both PCA and phenazine could be proposed as biopesticides to control the soybean pathogens M. phaseolina, C. nicotianae, and C. truncatum, and these results should prompt an investigation of their large-scale production and their suitable formulation for greenhouse and field applications.
“…The M. phaseolina 2013-1 strain was obtained from infected soybean roots grown in Pergamino, Buenos Aires, Argentina, as previously reported [ 13 ]. Cercospora nicotianae isolate Cn_2017_BOL34 was obtained from soybean leaves with Cercospora leaf blight symptoms sampled from commercial soybean fields in Santa Cruz, Bolivia in 2017 as previously reported [ 15 ]. The strain 17-5-1 of Colletotrichum truncatum was isolated from soybean leaves with anthracnose symptoms sampled from commercial soybean fields in Roldán, Santa Fe, Argentina in 2017.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fungi belonging to other genera such as Cercospora and Colletotrichum are causal agents of several diseases of soybean in Argentina and Brazil, which have also developed resistance or changes in sensitivity to commonly used fungicides [ 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 ].…”
Pseudomonas fluorescens 9 and Bacillus subtilis 54, proposed as biofungicides to control Macrophomina phaseolina, a dangerous pathogen of soybean and other crops, were grown in vitro to evaluate their ability to produce metabolites with antifungal activity. The aim of the manuscript was to identify the natural compounds responsible for their antifungal activity. Only the culture filtrates of P. fluorescens 9 showed strong antifungal activity against M. phaseolina. Its organic extract contained phenazine and mesaconic acid (1 and 2), whose antifungal activity was tested against M. phaseolina, as well as Cercospora nicotianae and Colletotrichum truncatum, other pathogens of soybean; however, only compound 1 exhibited activity. The antifungal activity of compound 1 was compared to phenazine-1-carboxylic acid (PCA, 3), 2-hydroxyphenazine (2-OH P, 4), and various semisynthetic phenazine nitro derivatives in order to perform a structure–activity relationship (SAR) study. PCA and phenazine exhibited the same percentage of growth inhibition in M. phaseolina and C. truncatum, whereas PCA (3) showed lower activity against C. nicotianae than phenazine. 2-Hydroxyphenazine (4) showed no antifungal activity against M. phaseolina. The results of the SAR study showed that electron attractor (COOH and NO2) or repulsor (OH) groups significantly affect the antifungal growth, as well as their α- or β-location on the phenazine ring. Both PCA and phenazine could be proposed as biopesticides to control the soybean pathogens M. phaseolina, C. nicotianae, and C. truncatum, and these results should prompt an investigation of their large-scale production and their suitable formulation for greenhouse and field applications.
“…The Kruskall–Wallis analysis of variance was used to assess differences among the EC 50 values to BZV and FXD, using R software 41 packages ‘ggplot2’ 42 and ‘rstatix’ 43 . The Kruskall–Wallis analysis was performed following the parameters described by Sautua et al 44 . Intrinsic activity was determined by the significant difference among EC 50 values for fungicides BZV and FXD.…”
“…La distribución de especies de las principales BLAST hit de los genes codificante de proteínas predichos se muestra en la Figura 76. El borrador del genoma secuenciado se encuentra públicamente disponible en GenBank NCBI NIH con el número de acceso VTAY00000000 (Sautua et al, 2019b H a partir de Amaranthus hybridus (Sautua et al, 2020b).…”
Section: Secuenciación De Genoma De Referencia De Cercospora Kikuchiiunclassified
En Argentina, diferentes especies de Cercospora causan el tizón de la hoja (TH) y la mancha púrpura de la semilla (MPS) en soja. Debido a que no hay variedades de soja resistentes disponibles en el mercado, el manejo de TH/MPS depende en gran medida de aplicaciones de fungicidas. En este estudio se determinó la sensibilidad de 62 cepas de Cercospora argentinas a fungicidas inhibidores de la desmetilación (DMI), carbamato de metilbenzimidazol (MBC), inhibidores de la quinona externa (QoI), inhibidores de la succinato deshidrogenasa (SDHI) y mancozeb. Todos los aislados fueron sensibles a difenoconazole, epoxiconazole, protioconazole, tebuconazole y cyproconazole (los valores de EC50 variaron de 0,006 a 2,4 µg mL-1). Por el contrario, la mitad (51%) de los aislados fueron sensibles (los valores de EC50 variaron de 0,003 a 0,2 µg mL-1) y la mitad (49%) altamente resistentes (EC50> 100 µg mL-1) a carbendazim. Todos los aislados fueron completamente resistentes a azoxystrobina, trifloxystrobina, pyraclostrobina e insensibles a boscalid, fluxapyroxad y pydiflumetofen (EC50 > 100 µg mL-1). La mutación G143A se detectó en el 82% de los aislados resistentes a QoI y la mutación E198A en el 97% de los aislados resistentes a carbendazim. No se detectaron mutaciones de resistencia aparentes en los genes que codifican para las subunidades B, C y D de la succinato deshidrogenasa. Mancozeb inhibió completamente el crecimiento micelial de los aislados evaluados a 100 µg mL-1. Todos los aislados argentinos de Cercospora fueron sensibles a los fungicidas DMI evaluados, pero se reporta por primera vez resistencia a los fungicidas QoI y MBC. Otro mecanismo(s) además de la modificación del sitio objeto de control del fungicida podrían ser responsable(s) de la resistencia de Cercospora a los fungicidas QoI y MBC. Además, debido a la reciente introducción de fungicidas SDHI en soja en Argentina, se especula que las especies de Cercospora que causan TH/MPS son insensibles (naturalmente resistentes) a este grupo de fungicidas. La insensibilidad debe confirmarse en condiciones de campo.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.