Fungi Associated with Cornstalks in Illinois in 1982 and 1983

Anderson, Brian P.; White, D. G.

doi:10.1094/pd-71-0135

Cited by 19 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…(1965)MexicoPresentPetatan‐Sagahon et al. (2011)USAAlabama, Arkansas, California, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Luisiana, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Nebraska, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina, North Dacota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Washington, West Virginia, WisconsinPresentAnderson and White (1987), Byrnes and Carroll (1984), Calvert et al. (1969), Carson and Wicks (1993), Clayton (1927), Dien et al.…”

Section: Appendix a – Distribution Of Stenocarpella Maydismentioning

confidence: 99%

Pest categorisation of Stenocarpella maydis

Bragard¹,

Baptista²,

Chatzivassiliou³

et al. 2022

EFS2

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The EFSA Plant Health Panel performed a pest categorisation of Stenocarpella maydis, a clearly defined fungus causing seedling blight, stalk and ear rot in maize, its only confirmed main host. The pathogen occurs in many countries of North, Central and South America, Africa, Asia and Oceania where maize is grown commercially. It is present in the EU with restricted distribution (Czech Republic and Spain). Stenocarpella maydis is not included in Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/ 2072. Plants for planting (maize seeds) is the main pathway of entry and spread in the EU. Host availability and climate are favourable for the establishment of the pathogen in maize-growing areas of the EU. The pathogen has a direct impact on yield and quality of maize production. Phytosanitary measures are available to mitigate further introduction and spread of the pathogen into the EU. The Panel concludes that S. maydis satisfies all the criteria to be regarded as a potential Union quarantine pest.

show abstract

Section: Appendix a – Distribution Of Stenocarpella Maydismentioning

confidence: 99%

Pest categorisation of Stenocarpella maydis

Bragard¹,

Baptista²,

Chatzivassiliou³

et al. 2022

EFS2

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In the 1980s and 1990s, this disease was observed in various fields of maize in the United States. In 1982& 1983, a survey done in Illinois demonstrated that 34 to 46% of diseased maize stalks had the spores of C. Graminicola (Anderson & White, 1987). The production grain loss due to this disease estimated varies from 0 to 40 percent.…”

Section: Anthracnose Stalk Rotmentioning

confidence: 99%

Seed-Borne Fungal Diseases of Maize (Zea mays L.): A Review

Rehman

Adnan

Kalsoom

et al. 2021

Agrinula : J. Agroteknol. Perkebunan

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introduction: Maize (Zea mays) is one of the most important cereal crops. It is ranked as 3rd after wheat and rice. Due to its wide adaptability, diversified uses, and low production costs, it has great potential as a cereal crop. In the case of yield losses, various factors are involved. The fungal diseases of maize play a significant role in the reduction of both quantity as well as the quality of maize. Review Results: At the seedling stage, maize suffers from numerous diseases and many of them are seed-borne diseases. Anthracnose stalk rot (Colletotrichum graminicola), Charcoal rot of maize (Macrophomina phaseolina), Crazy top downy mildew disease (Sclerophthora macrospora), Corn grey leaf spot disease (Cercospora zeae-maydis), Aspergillus ear and kernel rot (Aspergillus flavus), Corn smut (Ustilago maydis), Southern corn leaf blight disease (Bipolaris maydis) etc. are important among these diseases.Chemical control of seed-borne pathogens of maize is rather difficult to achieve as a reasonably good. Due to the hazardous environmental effects of chemicals, the Integrated Management of the seed-borne fungal pathogens of corn is mostly preferred. The distribution, disease cycle, symptoms of the damage, effects of environmental factors, economical importance of disease, and integrated disease management options of major seed-borne fungal pathogens of maize have been reviewed in this review article from various currently available sources.

show abstract

“…Em geral, o aumento da intensidade das podridões de diplodia aumentou, tanto nos Estados Unidos (Anderson & White, 1987), como no Brasil (Casa et al, 2000;, em função da adoção e difusão do plantio direto. O posicionamento da palha sobre a superfície do solo torna sua decomposição mais lenta, favorecendo a esporulação, liberação, dispersão e inoculação dos fungos, sendo esta a razão para a maior intensidade das podridões do colmo e da espiga observadas no sistema plantio direto sob monocultura.…”

Section: Decomposição Dos Restos Culturais De Milhounclassified

Decomposição dos restos culturais do milho e sobrevivência saprofítica de Stenocarpella macrospora e S. maydis

2003

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Em amostras de colmos de milho (Zea mays) coletadas em lavouras comerciais, conduzidas no sistema plantio direto, localizadas na Região do Planalto Médio do Rio Grande do Sul, no período de 1998 a 2000, determinou-se a sobrevivência saprofítica dos fungos Stenocarpella macrospora e S. maydis. Constatou-se que a presença da palha de milho infetada na época de semeadura assegura a sobrevivência destes fungos e garante a presença do inóculo para a cultura do milho. Nas avaliações feitas no ano de 1995, a decomposição da palha do milho, mantida na superfície do solo, foi de 78,5% aos 29 meses após a exposição no campo. Nas avaliações procedidas no ano de 1999, aonde foi comparado o efeito da posição do resíduo cultural no solo, estimou-se que a decomposição de segmentos de colmos infetados por S. maydis e S. macrospora mantidos na superfície do solo foi mais lenta do que quando foram enterrados. Apesar da freqüência dos picnídios de S. maydis e S. macrospora ter diminuído ao longo do tempo, a sua presença foi detectada até 320 dias em colmos mantidos na superfície do solo. A viabilidade dos conídios de S. maydis e S. macrospora nos colmos mantidos na superfície do solo foi superior a 90%, após 320 dias de exposição dos colmos no campo. Os resultados demonstraram que no sistema plantio direto a presença da palha de milho infetada assegura a sobrevivência dos fungos S. maydis e S. macrospora.

show abstract

Fungi Associated with Cornstalks in Illinois in 1982 and 1983

Cited by 19 publications

References 0 publications

Pest categorisation of Stenocarpella maydis

Pest categorisation of Stenocarpella maydis

Seed-Borne Fungal Diseases of Maize (Zea mays L.): A Review

Decomposição dos restos culturais do milho e sobrevivência saprofítica de Stenocarpella macrospora e S. maydis

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About