2019
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-25506-0_18
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fungal Phytoremediation of Heavy Metal-Contaminated Resources: Current Scenario and Future Prospects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 85 publications
0
16
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Table 1 represents the various sources of lead contamination in agricultural soils, crops, and water in different countries/regions of the world. It is evidenced in Table 1 that the anthropogenic products and processes (such as industrial, oil-processing activities, agrochemicals, paint, smelting, mining, refining, informal recycling of lead, cosmetics, peeling window and door frames, jewelry, toys, ceramics, pottery, plumbing materials and alloys, water from old pipes, vinyl mini-blinds, stained glass, lead-glazed dishes, firearms with lead bullets, batteries, radiators for cars and trucks, and some colors of ink) are considered to be major sources of Pb contamination in the environment [14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21].…”
Section: Sources Of Pb Contamination In Soil Crops and Water Resourcesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Table 1 represents the various sources of lead contamination in agricultural soils, crops, and water in different countries/regions of the world. It is evidenced in Table 1 that the anthropogenic products and processes (such as industrial, oil-processing activities, agrochemicals, paint, smelting, mining, refining, informal recycling of lead, cosmetics, peeling window and door frames, jewelry, toys, ceramics, pottery, plumbing materials and alloys, water from old pipes, vinyl mini-blinds, stained glass, lead-glazed dishes, firearms with lead bullets, batteries, radiators for cars and trucks, and some colors of ink) are considered to be major sources of Pb contamination in the environment [14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21].…”
Section: Sources Of Pb Contamination In Soil Crops and Water Resourcesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, plants uptake metal ions from soils through their roots [17,18,20]. Pb from the soil solution is adsorbed (unevenly) through roots and is bound with the uronic acid/polysaccharide of rhizoderm in many plant species such as Brassica juncea [70], Festuca rubra [71], Funaria hygrometrica [72,73], Lactuca sativa [74], and Vigna unguiculata [68].…”
Section: Lead Transportation Toxicity and Bioaccumulation Through Fmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pathogenic bacteria, fungi, viruses, nematodes, and protists are the major biotic factors affecting agricultural production [95,96]. The PGPR can suppress the growth of phytopathogens and other deleterious microorganisms through antagonism by producing antagonistic substances (i.e., siderophores, antibiotics, hydrogen cyanide, and antimicrobial metabolites), parasitism, competing for nutrients and space, producing various lytic enzymes (e.g., chitinases, glucanases, and proteases), and inducing systemic resistance in plants [8,[97][98][99][100][101][102][103]. The PGPR genera, such as Bacillus, Serratia, Streptomyces, Pseudomonas, Burkholderia, Paenibacillus, Klebsiella, Enterobacter, Alcaligenes, Arthrobacter, Azospirillum, and Azotobacter, are widely utilized to combat the biotic stresses [104][105][106][107].…”
Section: Mitigation Of Biotic Stressmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was found that there was a great difference in the rate of biodegradation, and regularity of process outcome differs between in situ and ex situ methods. The ex situ bioremediation cost is reasonably high as compared to in situ due to the cost of uncovering of contaminated samples for treatment (Kumar et al 2019a). Both the bioremediation methods are basically determined by microbial metabolism, but in situ methods are superior over ex situ for ecological reestablishment of contaminated site (Vidali 2001).…”
Section: )mentioning
confidence: 99%