1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0091-6749(99)70476-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fungal extracellular polysaccharides in house dust as a marker for exposure to fungi: Relations with culturable fungi, reported home dampness, and respiratory symptoms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
68
1
2

Year Published

2002
2002
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 126 publications
(78 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
5
68
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Airborne mold samples, used in many studies as the measure of exposure, are quite variable over time [e.g., seasonal variation (Beaumont et al 1984;Gravesen 1972;Ren et al 1999)] and space [i.e., indoors vs. outdoors (Beaumont et al 1984) or between locations indoors, e.g., basements vs. living rooms (Ren et al 1999)] and as such have drawn criticism when used to represent longer-term levels of exposure (Verhoeff and Burge 1997). Estimates of cumulative exposure to mold from a single point-in-time sample are provided by dust sample analyses of ergosterol (Dharmage et al 2001) or extracellular polysaccharide (Chew et al 2001;Douwes et al 1999). However, results of dust sample analyses are relatively nonspecific because they involve quantification of the aggregate fungal biomass of any molds.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Airborne mold samples, used in many studies as the measure of exposure, are quite variable over time [e.g., seasonal variation (Beaumont et al 1984;Gravesen 1972;Ren et al 1999)] and space [i.e., indoors vs. outdoors (Beaumont et al 1984) or between locations indoors, e.g., basements vs. living rooms (Ren et al 1999)] and as such have drawn criticism when used to represent longer-term levels of exposure (Verhoeff and Burge 1997). Estimates of cumulative exposure to mold from a single point-in-time sample are provided by dust sample analyses of ergosterol (Dharmage et al 2001) or extracellular polysaccharide (Chew et al 2001;Douwes et al 1999). However, results of dust sample analyses are relatively nonspecific because they involve quantification of the aggregate fungal biomass of any molds.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared to dust sample analyses that can quantify cumulative exposure to mold in general (e.g., Chew et al 2001;Dharmage et al 2001; Douwes et al 1999), air sampling remains the best way to identify genera and species of molds found in and around a home (Ren et al 1999). Relationships between exposure to mold and respiratory symptoms of children have been explored for airborne samples analyzed as total mold spore counts (Platt et al 1989;Strachan et al 1990;Waegemaekers et al 1989), and as concentrations of specific genera (e.g., Cladosporium, Penicillium, Alternaria, Aspergillus) (Garrett et al 1998;Li et al 1995;Su et al 2001a).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Exposure to EPS was found to significantly reduce the risk of physician-diagnosed asthma [62] and atopic wheeze [10], while exposure to (1,3)-b-Dglucan was significantly inversely related to sensitisation against inhalant allergens among 2-4-yr-old children [13].…”
Section: Mould Components Exposurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chew et al (2001) studied fungal extracellular polysaccharides (EPS), b (1,3)-glucans and culturable fungi in house dust that was sampled at six occasions in 23 Dutch homes during a period of 1 year. They showed that the within-home variation for EPS in house dust was smaller than the between-home variation suggesting that a one-time measurement of EPS (a general marker for fungal biomass in house dust; Douwes et al, 1999) is a good proxy for long-term fungal exposure. The within-home variability for b (1,3)-glucans and culturable fungi was large and in case of fungi even exceeded the between-home variability suggesting that a one-time measurement to assess long-term exposure to fungi may not be valid.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%