2019
DOI: 10.1007/s13225-019-00429-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fungal diversity notes 1036–1150: taxonomic and phylogenetic contributions on genera and species of fungal taxa

Abstract:  Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research.  You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain  You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

6
149
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 157 publications
(156 citation statements)
references
References 462 publications
(714 reference statements)
6
149
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Members of Penicillium are widespread in food products, soil, plant-decaying materials, animals and indoor environments ( Visagie et al, 2016 ; Diao et al, 2018 ; Heo et al, 2019 ). Many recent studies reported Penicillium strains belonging to the section Lanata-Divaricata ( Visagie et al, 2016 ; Lorenzini et al, 2019 ; Hyde et al, 2019a ; Guevara-Suarez et al, 2020 ). Delimiting species in this section based only on morphological characteristics is difficult; accordingly, ITS, BenA , CaM and RPB2 are used to delimit species boundaries ( Visagie et al, 2016 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Members of Penicillium are widespread in food products, soil, plant-decaying materials, animals and indoor environments ( Visagie et al, 2016 ; Diao et al, 2018 ; Heo et al, 2019 ). Many recent studies reported Penicillium strains belonging to the section Lanata-Divaricata ( Visagie et al, 2016 ; Lorenzini et al, 2019 ; Hyde et al, 2019a ; Guevara-Suarez et al, 2020 ). Delimiting species in this section based only on morphological characteristics is difficult; accordingly, ITS, BenA , CaM and RPB2 are used to delimit species boundaries ( Visagie et al, 2016 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overall, these results support the conclusions based on morphology that all Bactrocera are infected by a single species of Stigmatomyces , but neither can rule out cryptic speciation. The closest sister species in the phylogeny is S. gregarius W. Rossi, isolated from a stalk‐eyed fly (Diopsidae), a host which is distantly related to Bactrocera (Tephritidae), but the current phylogenetic coverage includes only a fraction of the Stigmatomyces diversity (Hyde et al., 2019) and may lack more closely related congeners.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Phylogenetic analyses were performed from single gene (LSU dataset) as well as based on a combined LSU, SSU, TEF1-α, RPB2 and ITS sequence dataset. Sequences generated from this study were analyzed with other similar sequences obtained from GenBank and those derived from recent publications [32,10,19,9,5,6,7] (Table 1). The single gene alignment was performed by using MAFFT v. 7 [33] (http://mafft.cbrc.jp/alignment/server/) and manually aligned wherever necessary in MEGA version 7.0 [34].…”
Section: Sequence Alignment and Phylogenetic Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there was little information regarding the phylogenetic relationships of Torula until the studies of Crous et al [8], Li et al [5] and Su et al [6,7]. To date, only 15 species have their DNA sequence data being analysed to reveal their phylogenetic placements in Torulaceae [18,19,9,5,6,7,20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%