2007
DOI: 10.1670/07-033.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fungal and Viral Pathogen Occurrence in Costa Rican Amphibians

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
4
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It is not possible for us to determine whether Bd played a role in the decline of our study species at LCBS. However, we note that Picco and Collins [61] detected Bd at LCBS but did not detect Bd on any strictly terrestrial, direct-developing frog species there, including two of our study species. Furthermore, our study species and their relatives are known to increase in community dominance [30] and abundance [62] within four years of Bd -related faunal collapse.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 63%
“…It is not possible for us to determine whether Bd played a role in the decline of our study species at LCBS. However, we note that Picco and Collins [61] detected Bd at LCBS but did not detect Bd on any strictly terrestrial, direct-developing frog species there, including two of our study species. Furthermore, our study species and their relatives are known to increase in community dominance [30] and abundance [62] within four years of Bd -related faunal collapse.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 63%
“…The absence of Bd in fourteen surveyed species could be an artifact of the small sample sizes (1–10 individuals, Table ) because some of these species have tested positive in other studies in Costa Rica and nearby Panama (e.g., Engystomops pustulosus , Duellmanohyla rufioculis , Anotheca spinosa , Leptodactylus poecilochilus ) (Picco & Collins, ; Rodríguez‐Brenes, Rodriguez, Ibáñez, & Ryan, ; Zumbado‐Ulate et al, ). Low sample sizes were caused by low detectability during the survey period for some of the common species (e.g., Rhinella horribilis, Smilisca sordida, Lithobates vaillanti, Leptodactylus savagei ) or due to the low year‐round detectability for the more cryptic and rare species (e.g., fossorial and canopy dwellers like Oedipina gracilis, Bolitoglossa colonnea, Cruziohyla calcarifer ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bd is widely distributed throughout North and South America (Ouellet et al 2005, Picco & Collins 2007. It occurs throughout the United States, particularly in the northeast (Longcore et al 2007, Campbell Grant et al 2008, the southeast (Green & Dodd 2007, Peterson et al 2007, Rothermel et al 2008, and the west (Cummer et al 2005, Pearl et al 2007.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%