2022
DOI: 10.1080/00934690.2022.2154999
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Funding in the “Field:” An Analysis of Demographics and Methods in National Science Foundation Archaeology Grants (1955–2020)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Of the 1,028 publications in our study, we excluded 15 because gender was not clear. Alternative methods of gender identification such as survey-based research (e.g., Heath-Stout 2020a), in which respondents self-report gender, resolve this problem, although surveys often run the risk of nonrepresentative samples due to self-selection (Heath-Stout and Jalbert 2023). Institutional affiliation allows for assessment of an author's occupational context (academic, museum, etc.)…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Of the 1,028 publications in our study, we excluded 15 because gender was not clear. Alternative methods of gender identification such as survey-based research (e.g., Heath-Stout 2020a), in which respondents self-report gender, resolve this problem, although surveys often run the risk of nonrepresentative samples due to self-selection (Heath-Stout and Jalbert 2023). Institutional affiliation allows for assessment of an author's occupational context (academic, museum, etc.)…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alas, we do not address the impact of racism, ableism, heteronormativity, and other forms of discrimination on research productivity. Nevertheless, recent investigations of gender in the practice of archaeology, such as the question of why fewer women apply for senior-level grants (Goldstein et al 2018) and the prominence of men and women in lab versus field projects (Heath-Stout and Jalbert 2023), succeeded without access to data on sexuality, ethnicity, or class.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%