2012
DOI: 10.1080/21507716.2012.678550
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Funding and Forums for ELSI Research: Who (or What) Is Setting the Agenda?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
(28 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These studies, and others conducted without NHGRI support, have led to the publication of thousands of papers, ranging from examinations of ethical issues in genetic and genomic research and clinical translation, to analyses of legal, public policy, and broader societal issues that the emerging technologies raise more generally [3]. …”
Section: Old But Persistent Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These studies, and others conducted without NHGRI support, have led to the publication of thousands of papers, ranging from examinations of ethical issues in genetic and genomic research and clinical translation, to analyses of legal, public policy, and broader societal issues that the emerging technologies raise more generally [3]. …”
Section: Old But Persistent Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the same time, ceasing to fund such studies could result in some important disease-specific ELSI research lacking any home for funding and thus not being done at all. [Although some small, typically more conceptual, studies of ethical, legal, and social issues can be done without funding agency support (65), most of the larger, empirically oriented studies require it. ]…”
Section: Priority-setting Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the role and importance of ELSI research has not been uncontested. Questions have been raised over sources of funding and the potential influence on the research agenda [ 3 ], and whether ELSI research should be driven by public policy or the scientific community [ 4 , 5 ]. Critics of ELSI have suggested that its research is not truly collaborative and contributions made by social scientists, lawyers and ethicists are ‘often limited to narrow, prescriptive positions’ [ 6 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%