2002
DOI: 10.1002/j.1467-8438.2002.tb00518.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fundamentals of Theory and Practice Revisited: Adult Clients With Mild ‘Intellectual Disability’: Rethinking Our Assumptions

Abstract: There is considerable confusion surrounding the concept of ‘intellectual disability’ and great stigma attached to this label. This paper questions whether the concept is a useful one when applied to adults with mild learning difficulties and encourages less rigidity in categorisation. Some implications of a pseudo‐medical model are examined. Counselling for adults with mild intellectual disabilities has been much neglected. Some aspects of counselling these individuals are briefly discussed: expectations; comm… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Yet another complicating factor is the fact that while IQ has historically been used as the main criteria for assessing ID, other factors such as adaptive deficits are more important in determining which individuals are labeled as ID. IQ measurements are also not a particularly useful measure of an individual's communicative capacities, as individuals with the same IQ can vary greatly in verbal fluency (Gallagher, 2002).…”
Section: Thematic Results: On Categorizing the Heterogeneity Of Commumentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Yet another complicating factor is the fact that while IQ has historically been used as the main criteria for assessing ID, other factors such as adaptive deficits are more important in determining which individuals are labeled as ID. IQ measurements are also not a particularly useful measure of an individual's communicative capacities, as individuals with the same IQ can vary greatly in verbal fluency (Gallagher, 2002).…”
Section: Thematic Results: On Categorizing the Heterogeneity Of Commumentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Individuals with ID who were successful at identity matching tasks were better at matching pictures to objects than at matching icons, pantomimes, or speech to objects and that delayed matching tasks were most successful using spoken names (Brady & McLean, 1998). Slowing down both the pace of communication as well as the pace at which new concepts are introduced has also been suggested as a means of improving receptive communication for individuals with ID (Oetting & Rice, 1991;Gallagher, 2002).…”
Section: Thematic Results: Receptive Communication In Individuals Witmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Gallagher (2002) [1] describes intellectual disability as one of the most powerful and stigmatizing labels. Zhang and Stecker (2001) [2] mention that intellectually disabled students possess an internal barrier, namely "learned helplessness", which makes disabled students believe that they are unable to be involved in their own vocational planning.…”
Section: Literature Review Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite these challenges, most staff have little exposure to systemic practice (Gallagher, 2002). The status and training of case managers generally is limited, with poor conceptualization of their role and inadequate career progression (Gursansky et al, 2003).…”
Section: Introduction: Challenges In Disability Servicesmentioning
confidence: 98%