Fundamentals of ISO 9001:2015

Leontyuk, S. M.; Vinogradova, A. A.; Silivanov, M. O.

doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1384/1/012068

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Conducting one's own research activities is a recognized tool for adapting to changes, maintaining stability and improving the efficiency of a large organization [1,2,3], including a university. At present, it is advisable to build the quality management system of the university in accordance with the trends in technology and economics, which are associated with the concept of "Industry 4.0" [4,5,6].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The approaches for assessing the quality of scientific research at St. Petersburg Mining university

Radushinsky

Kremcheeva²,

Смирнова³

et al. 2023

E3S Web of Conf.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The article considers approaches to the development of criteria for assessing the quality of scientific research in St. Petersburg Mining University, Russia (Mining University), the functioning of which contains the main features of research university as well as of a scientific organization. The research methods include expert assessments, analysis and synthesis and other desk research methods. Based on the analysis of the results of the scientific activity of the organization in recent years, a set of basic quantitative indicators has been developed, as well as a set of additional qualitative indicators of the effectiveness of the scientific departments of the university. Qualitative indicators, including the rating assessment of the research carried out by the Scientific and Technical Council of the university, are designed to complement the widely used scientometric data. Thus, scientometric, financial indicators and a comprehensive (multifactorial) qualitative assessment can serve as criteria for the quality assessment for the scientific activity of the university. The information obtained is relevant for the formation of a quality management system for scientific research at Mining University, as well as for other research universities with a similar organizational structure. However, the conclusions obtained cannot be automatically extended to the procedures for the formation of quality management systems for scientific research in organizations of a different profile.

show abstract