Fundamentals of Argumentation Theory

Eemeren, F.H. van; Grootendorst, Rob; Henkemans, A. Francisca Snoeck; Blair, J. Anthony; Johnson, Ralph H.; Krabbe, Erik C. W.; Plantin, Christian; Walton, Douglas; Willard, Charles Arthur; Woods, John; Zarefsky, David

doi:10.4324/9780203811306

Cited by 160 publications

(31 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Argumentation ist eine allgegenwärtige Grundlage unserer täglichen Kommunikation und unseres Denkens. Im Allgemeinen zielt sie darauf ab, die Akzeptanz eines umstrittenen Standpunktes zu erhöhen oder zu verringern [16]. Logisch strukturierte Argumente sind eine notwendige Voraussetzung für überzeugende Gespräche, allgemeine Entscheidungen und Schlussfolgerungen.…”

Section: Lernen Von Argumentationsfähigkeitenunclassified

Systematische Entwicklung eines Lerntools zur Erhöhung der Argumentationsfähigkeiten von Studierenden

Wambsganss¹,

Weber²,

Staufenberg³

et al. 2020

WI2020 Zentrale Tracks

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Die Digitalisierung führt zu neuen Anforderungen an Fähigkeiten und Kenntnissen, die Studierende in ihrem zukünftigen Berufsleben benötigen. Metakognitive Lernkompetenzen und Higher Order Thinking Skills werden dabei immer wichtiger, um Herausforderungen der Zukunft zu lösen. Eine Unterklasse dieser Fähigkeiten, die wesentlich zu Kommunikation, Kollaboration und Problemlösung beiträgt, ist die Fähigkeit, strukturiert und reflektierend zu argumentieren. Bildungseinrichtungen haben jedoch Schwierigkeiten, die für die Entwicklung dieser Fähigkeit notwendigen Rahmenbedingungen zu schaffen. In diesem Paper stellen wir unser Design Science Research Projekt vor, in dem wir ein Lerntool entwickeln, dass es ermöglicht, Studierende durch intelligentes Feedback beim Erlernen von Argumentation zu unterstützen. Wir präsentieren dazu acht Designprinzipien, abgeleitet aus aktueller Literatur und aus 21 Nutzerinterviews, sowie einen evaluierten Prototyen als eine Form der Instanziierung dieser Prinzipien. Ziel unseres Forschungsprojektes ist es, ein Lerntool zu entwickeln, das Studierenden hilft, ihre Argumentationsfähigkeit durch individuelles Feedback zu verbessern.

show abstract

Section: Lernen Von Argumentationsfähigkeitenunclassified

Systematische Entwicklung eines Lerntools zur Erhöhung der Argumentationsfähigkeiten von Studierenden

Wambsganss¹,

Weber²,

Staufenberg³

et al. 2020

WI2020 Zentrale Tracks

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Van Eemeren et al (2014: 6) define argumentation as ‘a communicative and interactional act complex’ that aims to reconcile an arguer's view with that of an addressee who holds a divergent opinion. In defining arguments as communicative, argumentation theorists pay attention to the structure of the arguments advanced, the context in which they are made, and whether they are made explicitly or implicitly (Van Eemeren et al 1996; Van Rees 2007).…”

Section: Political Media Discourse Critical Discourse Analysis and Amentioning

confidence: 99%

First there were 10: the case for and against South Sudan's new states using discourse analysis and argumentation theory

Tombe

2019

J. Mod. Afr. Stud.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In 2015, South Sudan increased the number of its states from 10 to 28, followed by four more states in 2017. The redrawing of internal borders came through presidential decree as South Sudan's violent civil war continued to unfold. This development has led to two ardent voices: one arguing to maintain the new states, and another advocating to reverse them. Applying argumentation theory and critical discourse analysis to news articles, analysis pieces, and press releases collected from Gurtong and Sudan Tribune from July 2015 to April 2017, this article assesses the argument advanced by both camps and evaluates their implications for peace in South Sudan. In examining the claim, the counter-claim, and their underlying premises, the article finds areas of contention and convergence between the two camps and argues for the compatibility of the values which undergird both positions.

show abstract

“…In The New Rhetoric , Perelman and Olbrechts-Tyteca focus mainly on historical figures and perfect beings as models, and, for the most part, so do current perspectives. For example, van Eemeren, Grootendorst, Johnson, Plantin, and Willard (2013) explain, “A model may consist of an idealized contemporary, but may also be a historical figure or a being represented as perfect” (p. 116). Foss, Foss, and Trapp (2014) offer a slight expansion in their characterization of Perelman and Olbrechts-Tyteca’s concept by mentioning legal precedents as models, considering events as models, in addition to people (p. 100).…”

Section: Argumentation By Self-model and Narratives Of Personal Transmentioning

confidence: 99%

Argumentation by Self-Model: Missing Methods and Opportunities in the Personal Narratives of Popular Health Coaches

Gigante

2017

Journal of Technical Writing and Communication

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This essay expands Perelman and Olbrechts-Tyteca’s concept of argumentation by model to bring more attention to the persuasive effects of using the self as a model. To illuminate this technique, I analyze the personal narratives of popular health coaches, who are championing a holistic health movement toward what I refer to as “do-it-yourself healthcare.” This case involves arguments regarding the efficacy of methods in evidence-based medicine and “alternative” or holistic health, as popular health coaches predicate their ability to heal themselves and others on abandoning traditional medicine. In brief, the purpose of this article is twofold: first, to characterize the rhetoric of the movement toward alternative or holistic health, and, second, to extend Perelman and Olbrechts-Tyteca’s concept of argumentation by model and address the implications of this expansion.

show abstract

Fundamentals of Argumentation Theory

Cited by 160 publications

References 0 publications

Systematische Entwicklung eines Lerntools zur Erhöhung der Argumentationsfähigkeiten von Studierenden

Systematische Entwicklung eines Lerntools zur Erhöhung der Argumentationsfähigkeiten von Studierenden

First there were 10: the case for and against South Sudan's new states using discourse analysis and argumentation theory

Argumentation by Self-Model: Missing Methods and Opportunities in the Personal Narratives of Popular Health Coaches

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About