1951
DOI: 10.1119/1.1932798
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fundamentals of Acoustics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
50
0
6

Year Published

2003
2003
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 789 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
50
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…While this does not actually represent the physical situation, the experimental results appear to agree with this model. Using this model, the stenosis diameters are determined in the following manner: For plane wave reflection at an interface, conservation of energy requires that the sum of the sound power reflection coefficient, R, and the sound power transmission coefficient, T, must equal unity (21). Therefore, R ϩ T ϭ 1.…”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While this does not actually represent the physical situation, the experimental results appear to agree with this model. Using this model, the stenosis diameters are determined in the following manner: For plane wave reflection at an interface, conservation of energy requires that the sum of the sound power reflection coefficient, R, and the sound power transmission coefficient, T, must equal unity (21). Therefore, R ϩ T ϭ 1.…”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In real fluids, there are very significant contributions to this damping from thermal conduction and molecular relaxation [6,15]. It remains to be seen how the LBM may be adapted to handle all three damping mechanisms.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Assuming low Mach number, adiabatic compression, and sufficient distance to boundaries, it may be shown similarly to [6] that this implies a lossy wave equation,…”
Section: (A) Solutions To the Lossy Wave Equationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The density of human and porcine clots is 1.076·10 3 kg/ m 3 and 1.058·10 3 kg/m 3 , respectively, and the speed of sound is 1.6·10 3 m/s for both types of clots. The intensity reflection coefficient (Kinsler et al 1982) from the interface between human or porcine clot and water is 5.2 · 10 −3 and 4.0 · 10 −3 , respectively. Therefore, the reduction of amplitude as a result of reflection from the clot surface may be ignored.…”
Section: Theoretical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, the transmission coefficients γ for sound passing through a layer of bone were estimated as a function of frequency by using the boundary conditions presented in Kinsler et al (1982). We have considered the layer of a bone as an isotropic medium with uniform density with the thickness of h = 3.8 · 10 −3 m and with the values for the coefficient of attenuation presented in Table 1.…”
Section: Theoretical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%