2017
DOI: 10.1080/13619462.2017.1408536
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fundamentals at stake: the Conservatives, industrial relations and the rhetorical framing of the miners’ strike in 1984/1985

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thatcher and her government during the 1984-5 Miners' strike, with unionists portrayed as the UK's 'enemy within' with the USSR as the 'enemy without' 14 , may cast a long shadow over a period and places for no new economic narrative or rationale has been found (Steber, 2018;Beatty et al, 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thatcher and her government during the 1984-5 Miners' strike, with unionists portrayed as the UK's 'enemy within' with the USSR as the 'enemy without' 14 , may cast a long shadow over a period and places for no new economic narrative or rationale has been found (Steber, 2018;Beatty et al, 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mining community residents are on almost all our measures (compared to matched individuals elsewhere) less interested in, and feel far less knowledgeable about politics; they are less likely to have voted (and feel this is true of their neighbours), and far less likely to intend to; and they (no doubt-relatedly) are more likely to think voting doesn't matter. It is impossible to say from where these attitudes stem, but the rhetoric of Margaret Thatcher and her government during the 1984-5 Miners' strike -with unionists portrayed as the UK's 'enemy within' with the USSR as the 'enemy without' 11may cast a long shadow over a period and places for no new economic narrative or rationale has been found (Steber, 2018;Beatty et al 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Modernization becomes an absolute imperative, which is defined at least in part by its opposition – ‘That which is not “on-side” or “on-message” is by definition anti-modernisation and out-dated’ (Finlayson, 1998: 18). 10 This rush to ‘modernisation’ left working-class memories of the conflict unaddressed, with lasting effects in twenty-first-century British society (Steber, 2018), including the impact on the defeated mining communities themselves (Nettleingham, 2017; Perchard, 2013), and particularly the toxic legacy in the former coalfields of Nottinghamshire, where Unions and communities were bitterly divided (Emery, 2018). Attempts to tell the story of labour history in the United Kingdom, and particularly the pivotal moment of the strike and its aftermath, demonstrate clear tensions between mediatized versions of collective memory, most of which internalize the modernization narrative to some degree, and the unresolved trauma of a largely untold bottom-up history rooted in experience.…”
Section: ‘Modernize or Die!’: Burying Struggle In The Coalfieldsmentioning
confidence: 99%