1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0304-4203(96)00082-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fundamental studies for chemical speciation of iron in seawater with an improved analytical method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
76
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 112 publications
(79 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
3
76
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The data collected here on several occasions show significant differences between DFe, as measured by the luminol H 2 O 2 chemiluminescence method (de Jong et al, 1998;Obata et al, 1993Obata et al, , 1997, and Fe(II) as measured by luminol chemiluminescence (Croot and Laan, 2002). The main reason for this discrepancy appeared to be the long half-life of the Fe(II) and the loading pH employed with the Fe(III) method.…”
Section: Implications For Iron Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…The data collected here on several occasions show significant differences between DFe, as measured by the luminol H 2 O 2 chemiluminescence method (de Jong et al, 1998;Obata et al, 1993Obata et al, , 1997, and Fe(II) as measured by luminol chemiluminescence (Croot and Laan, 2002). The main reason for this discrepancy appeared to be the long half-life of the Fe(II) and the loading pH employed with the Fe(III) method.…”
Section: Implications For Iron Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…dfo-mpo.gc.ca/). For measurements of dissolved iron (DFe) concentrations, 0.22-μm filtered seawater sampled at 0, 10, 20, 30, and 40 m depth was collected in acid-washed 250-mL low-density polyethylene bottles and buffered to pH 3.5 for 1-2 h before FIA chemiluminescent analysis following the method of Obata et al (47,48). Iron concentrations represent the average value of the five depth samples.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The filtrate (100 ml) for Fe concentration analysis was buffered at pH 3.2 with a 10 mol l -1 formic acid, 2.4 mol l -1 ammonium formate buffer solution (0.5 ml 100 ml -1 filtrate). The Fe concentration in buffered filtrate (≤2 nmol l -1 ) was determined with an automated Fe analyzer (Kimoto Electric) by placing various concentrations on an 8-hydroxyquinoline chelating column and using luminol-hydrogen peroxide chemiluminescence (CL) detection in a closed flow-through system (Obata et al 1993(Obata et al , 1997. The concentrations of NO 3 +NO 2 , PO 4 , and Si(OH) 4 in the filtered seawater measured by a Technicon autoanalyzer were less than 0.5, 0.1, and 5 µmol l -1 , respectively, which are negligible compared with the concentrations added in the culture experiments (see below).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%