2020
DOI: 10.1111/brv.12642
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fundamental research questions in subterranean biology

Abstract: Five decades ago, a landmark paper in Science titled The Cave Environment heralded caves as ideal natural experimental laboratories in which to develop and address general questions in geology, ecology, biogeography, and evolutionary biology. Although the ‘caves as laboratory’ paradigm has since been advocated by subterranean biologists, there are few examples of studies that successfully translated their results into general principles. The contemporary era of big data, modelling tools, and revolutionary adva… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
74
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1
1

Relationship

5
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 88 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 178 publications
0
74
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A fundamental question in subterranean biology is whether the current patterns of subterranean biodiversity are best explained by a “history of colonization of surface ancestors or by in situ speciation and dispersal in subterranean habitats” (Mammola et al. 2020). The CRH and ASH are the generally accepted scenarios for the evolution of cave species in major animal groups—insects, arachnids, and vertebrates (Holsinger 1988, 2000; Peck and Finston 1993; Leys et al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A fundamental question in subterranean biology is whether the current patterns of subterranean biodiversity are best explained by a “history of colonization of surface ancestors or by in situ speciation and dispersal in subterranean habitats” (Mammola et al. 2020). The CRH and ASH are the generally accepted scenarios for the evolution of cave species in major animal groups—insects, arachnids, and vertebrates (Holsinger 1988, 2000; Peck and Finston 1993; Leys et al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As reason prevailed upon mythology, caves became the arena for debating scientific ideas and ultimately good model systems for understanding the outside world (Poulson and White 1969). Yet, while we typically insist that our research is exciting, adventurous, and important to answer cutting-edge questions (Juan et al 2010;Sánchez-Fernández et al 2018;Mammola 2019;Mammola et al 2019Mammola et al , 2020, this potential is often lost when the results are translated into scientific publications. Too often, the generality of our results remains unexpressed insofar as cave research is written by cave scientists for cave scientists.…”
Section: Cave Biologist As Prisoners In the Cavementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Encouraged by the inherent peculiarities of caves, we might have forgotten the importance of trying to address broad questions with our research, favouring the isolation of our research community and increasing our intellectual inbreeding. We believe that being aware of this potential is a fundamental step to frame broad-in-scope subterranean research (Mammola et al 2020), regardless of the journal in which it will end-up published. Inspired by the writer and philosopher Umberto Eco (1997), we propose a few bullet-point ideas for improving the generality of the literature on subterranean habitats, including both tips for framing broad-scoped research and for writing texts accessible to a general audience (Box 1).…”
Section: A Return To the Cavementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Cave fauna has relatively low specific richness, but high conservation value for the global biodiversity of our planet (Mammola et al 2019). Subterranean species have unique traits that emerged as a result of isolation and convengent adaptation towards the underground life (Mammola et al 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%