Glow Discharge Spectroscopies 1993
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4899-2394-3_2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fundamental Plasma Processes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Possible small changes in the EEDF, as the cathode material is changed, do not influence the emission yield significantly, when effects of discharge voltage and cathode surface area are taken into account. 32 This confirms the experience of relatively low matrix effects and linear calibration behaviour observed in GD-OES. The samples used for this experiment are mixture of Fe, Ni, and Cr.…”
Section: Dependence On Concentrationsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Possible small changes in the EEDF, as the cathode material is changed, do not influence the emission yield significantly, when effects of discharge voltage and cathode surface area are taken into account. 32 This confirms the experience of relatively low matrix effects and linear calibration behaviour observed in GD-OES. The samples used for this experiment are mixture of Fe, Ni, and Cr.…”
Section: Dependence On Concentrationsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…LA particles must be subjected to sufficient heat to completely vaporize them, after which collisions with plasma electrons or He metastable atoms (i.e., Penning collisions) affect the excited state populations of the atomic vapor. 26 Discharge current would be expected to play a role in the gas kinetic temperature of the plasma as well as in the rate of excited state-populating collisions. To a first approximation, higher discharge currents, and correspondingly higher power densities, would be expected to yield higher plasma temperatures (e.g., better vaporization), while also providing higher electron–atom collision rates.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The plasma characteristics (i.e., plasma temperatures, electron number density, and robustness) have been investigated recently in hopes of a better understanding of the LS-APGD's potential as an excitation–ionization source for liquid samples. 23,26 While the plasma excitation temperature (*2600 K) may not be as high as that of a typical ICP (typically 7000–10 000 K), the electron number density (3 × 10 15 cm –3 ) is on the same order of magnitude. Rotational temperatures determined through OH and N 2 band emission are *1000 K. 23 While such values seem to be low in terms of vaporization capacity, the device has been shown to be effective as a secondary excitation–ionization source for particles generated by both nanosecond and femtosecond laser ablation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Discharge current and pressure are two of the three primary controlling parameters in the performance of any GD source, the third of which is the applied potential . In practice, the three parameters are interdependent.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the experiments performed here, the voltage was left as the dependent variable, with the pressure and current operated at fixed values during a given analysis. The interdependence of the discharge conditions results in differences in the atomization/excitation characteristics in all GD sources, particularly hollow cathodes . To a first approximation, discharge current affects the particle flux to the surface (i.e., sputtering events) and the density of the electrons in the gas phase (i.e., excitation events).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%