Fundamental pillars for industry 4.0 development: implementation framework and challenges in manufacturing environment

Singh, Mahipal; Goyat, Rekha; Panwar, Renu

doi:10.1108/tqm-07-2022-0231

Cited by 16 publications

(6 citation statements)

References 78 publications

(122 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Apart from model, it also required to analyse the barriers of LSS implementation and strategies that overcome the barriers. Due to poor planning and preparedness, many advance approaches gets fail (Singh et al , 2023a). Thus, the immense requirement for barriers and their solutions analysis of an approach sensed to implement it comprehensively from initial to last stage.…”

Section: Discussion On Findingsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…LSS combines the principles of Lean and Six Sigma to provide a comprehensive approach to process improvement that emphasizes the importance of data and statistical analysis, as well as the need for continuous improvement and customer satisfaction (Singh and Rathi, 2019). LSS is a process that aims to eliminate waste, reduce defects and improve the quality of the product to increase efficiency (Singh et al , 2023a). In recent years, big organizations in India have tried to adopt LSS practices to improve their operational efficiency, reduce waste and enhance customer satisfaction and obtained success up to some extent (Singh and Rathi, 2023).…”

Section: Literature Search Methodologymentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Empirical analysis of strategies to overcome the barriers of LSS implementation in Indian small manufacturing enterprises: an application of ISM-MICMAC

Singh,

Kaswan,

Rathi

2024

IJLSS

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose The purpose of this study is to explore and model the strategies to overcome the barriers of Lean Six Sigma (LSS) implementation in Indian small manufacturing enterprises (SMEs). Design/methodology/approach In this research, 31 strategies of LSS implementation in SMEs have been identified through detailed literature review and out of them, 13 are finalized using statistical tools like CIMTC and Importance-Index analysis. Moreover, the consistency of finalized strategies was examined through reliability test using SPSS software version 22. The finalized strategies are modelled through interpretive structural modelling (ISM) and classified them using MICMAC based on their driving and dependency power. Findings The key findings of this techno-managerial study are identification and modelling of 13 strategies to overcome adoption challenges of LSS in context of Indian SMEs. The usage of ISM-MICMAC approach provides the guidance to industrialist consider the mutual interaction of strategies during planning and scheduling for LSS projects. Research limitations/implications Due to human involvement and judgements, there may be chance of biasness and subjectivity during construction of self-interaction matrix. Also, the number of identified strategies to overcomes barriers of LSS adoption may vary by altering nature, scope and region of research. Originality/value Literature is full of studies regarding LSS barriers and its rankings. Also, few studies explored the solutions of LSS barriers and prioritized them. To the best of the authors’ knowledge, our study is very rare to witness which expose the strategies to overcome the barriers and frame the mutual interaction are per the driving and dependence power of strategies. The application of ISM-MICMAC approach suggests a roadmap for implementing LSS approach efficiently through considering developed ISM model of strategies in context of SMEs.

show abstract

Section: Discussion On Findingsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Literature Search Methodologymentioning

confidence: 99%

Empirical analysis of strategies to overcome the barriers of LSS implementation in Indian small manufacturing enterprises: an application of ISM-MICMAC

Singh,

Kaswan,

Rathi

2024

IJLSS

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Hence, this social transformation will naturally trigger the manufacturing society to improve their manufacturing suits to cope with the customer requirements and sustain competitive advantage. Furthermore, Singh, Goyat and Panwar (2023) concluded that "the emerging technologies such as IoT, blockchain, artificial intelligence, augmented reality, 3D printing, big-data analytics, and cloud-computing" support I4.0 in reducing human interference for effective and efficient systems. Finally, a thorough review of relevant articles integrating I4.0 technologies with Operational Excellence (OPEX) strategies (Pansare, Yadav & Nagare, 2022) concluded that advanced I4.0 technologies were the most prominent factor for improving organizational performance.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Manufacturing Companies Industry 4.0 maturity level: A multivariate analysis

Ciravegna Martins da Fonseca,

Pereira,

Oliveira

et al. 2024

JIEM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose: This research investigates Portuguese manufacturing companies' Industry 4.0 (I4.0) maturity perception level and proposes an index to measure that aim.Design/methodology/approach: This study uses a survey method to gather the companies' perceptions of their I4.0 maturity level and applies subsequent exploratory factor analysis to propose a global I4.0 measurement index.Findings: The research results show that the most critical factors in evaluating the perception level of I4.0 Perception Maturity (IPM) are strategy, leadership, and customer experiences. The result for the Global Index was 53.50%. Hence, the global Index companies' perception of the level of maturity of I4.0 in Portugal is medium.Research limitations/implications: This study encompasses only Portuguese manufacturing organizations (50 valid responses). Moreover, the research is subject to the limitations of the survey methodology, such as possible respondent bias.Practical implications: The Portuguese I4.0 strategy mainly targets small and medium-sized enterprises through a bottom-up approach. Hence, companies need proper methodologies and tools for evaluating I4.0 adoption, identifying their present situation concerning I4.0 and where to focus on improving the process and achieving the intended benefits.Social implications: This research identifies the main perceived benefits and obstacles of adopting I4.0, suggesting avenues for its successful implementation by the Portuguese companies.Originality/value: This study provides a valuable tool for manufacturing companies to identify the factors that need to be improved to create significant growth in the I4.0 Perception Maturity (IPM) index. Therefore, it can support companies in establishing a roadmap for successful I4.0 adoption and improving their performance and competitive position accordingly.

show abstract

“…Alves et al (2023) identify the Fifth Industrial Revolution as human-centered and sustainable [22]. Singh, Goyat, and Panwar (2023) said Industry 4.0 requires IoT, AI, and blockchain [23]. Industry 5.0 emphasizes human-centered construction.…”

Section: An Introduction To Thematic Area Interaction: the Aec Framew...mentioning

confidence: 99%

Reviewing and Integrating AEC Practices into Industry 6.0: Strategies for Smart and Sustainable Future-Built Environments

Almusaed,

Yitmen,

Almssad

2023

Sustainability

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This article explores the possible ramifications of incorporating ideas from AEC Industry 6.0 into the design and construction of intelligent, environmentally friendly, and long-lasting structures. This statement highlights the need to shift away from the current methods seen in the AEC Industry 5.0 to effectively respond to the increasing requirement for creative and environmentally sustainable infrastructures. Modern building techniques have been made more efficient and long-lasting because of AEC Industry 6.0’s cutting-edge equipment, cutting-edge digitalization, and ecologically concerned methods. The academic community has thoroughly dissected the many benefits of AEC Industry 5.0. Examples are increased stakeholder involvement, automation, robotics for optimization, decision structures based on data, and careful resource management. However, the difficulties of implementing AEC Industry 6.0 principles are laid bare in this research. It calls for skilled experts who are current on the latest technologies, coordinate the technical expertise of many stakeholders, orchestrate interoperable standards, and strengthen cybersecurity procedures. This study evaluates how well the principles of Industry 6.0 can create smart, long-lasting, and ecologically sound structures. The goal is to specify how these ideas may revolutionize the building industry. In addition, this research provides an in-depth analysis of how the AEC industry might best adopt AEC Industry 6.0, underscoring the sector-wide significance of this paradigm change. This study thoroughly analyzes AEC Industry 6.0 about big data analytics, the IoT, and collaborative robotics. To better understand the potential and potential pitfalls of incorporating AEC Industry 6.0 principles into the construction of buildings, this study examines the interaction between organizational dynamics, human actors, and robotic systems.

show abstract

Fundamental pillars for industry 4.0 development: implementation framework and challenges in manufacturing environment

Cited by 16 publications

References 78 publications

Empirical analysis of strategies to overcome the barriers of LSS implementation in Indian small manufacturing enterprises: an application of ISM-MICMAC

Empirical analysis of strategies to overcome the barriers of LSS implementation in Indian small manufacturing enterprises: an application of ISM-MICMAC

Manufacturing Companies Industry 4.0 maturity level: A multivariate analysis

Reviewing and Integrating AEC Practices into Industry 6.0: Strategies for Smart and Sustainable Future-Built Environments

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About