2007
DOI: 10.1117/12.716604
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fundamental limits of optical critical dimension metrology: a simulation study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
40
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…5,14 The general strategy of such a model-based identification technology is shown in Figure 1. 15,16 As mentioned before, the noise and the limited information obtained from real measurements lead to uncertainty (dp p) in the reconstructed parameters. To keep this difference smaller than the aspired uncertainties, both an improvement of the physical model used for the simulations and optimized measurement conditions are needed.…”
Section: Solving the Inverse Problem By Model-based Feature Reconstrumentioning
confidence: 97%
“…5,14 The general strategy of such a model-based identification technology is shown in Figure 1. 15,16 As mentioned before, the noise and the limited information obtained from real measurements lead to uncertainty (dp p) in the reconstructed parameters. To keep this difference smaller than the aspired uncertainties, both an improvement of the physical model used for the simulations and optimized measurement conditions are needed.…”
Section: Solving the Inverse Problem By Model-based Feature Reconstrumentioning
confidence: 97%
“…, N. For reasons of simplicity, in the following any systematic error is omitted and only random errors are considered. Following the approach suggested in [12], we assume that the noise of the measured data is normally distributed with standard deviations given just by the measured uncertainties {σ i } [13].…”
Section: Estimated Uncertaintiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, their measurement uncertainties are fundamentally limited by the underlying cross-correlations between the different fit parameters, e.g., line widths and heights. 3 To reduce parametric correlation and improve measurement performance and uncertainties, we have developed a Bayesian statistical approach that integrates a priori information gleaned from other measurements. This allows us to embed information obtained from reference metrology and complimentary ellipsometry of the optical constants, or to constrain the floating parametric range based on physical limits or known manufacturing variability.…”
Section: A New Approach Uses Embedded Data From Reference Metrology Tmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6 Historically, researchers have used least-squares fitting routines to select a set of parameters with the closest experiment-to-theory agreement. 3 Parametric correlation, measurement noise, and model inaccuracy all lead to measurement uncertainty in the fitting process. Even when a measurement demonstrates good sensitivity, cross-correlation among the parameters can lead to very large uncertainties and is the fundamental limitation to the goodness of fit.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation