2019
DOI: 10.1109/twc.2019.2919028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fundamental Limits of Memory-Latency Tradeoff in Fog Radio Access Networks Under Arbitrary Demands

Abstract: We consider a Fog Radio Access Network (F-RAN) with multiple of transmitters and receivers, where each transmitter is connected to the cloud via a fronthaul link. Each network node has a finite cache, where it fills its cache with portions of the library files in the off-peak hours. In the delivery phase, receivers request each library files according to an arbitrary popularity distribution. The cloud and the transmitters are responsible for satisfying the requests. This paper aims to design content placement … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
(54 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The work in [5] has studied an F-RAN with caches at both transmitters and receivers under the assumption that the content placement is applied in a decentralized manner. In [6], the authors have characterized both the peak NDT and the expected NDT under uniform popularity distribution for F-RAN with caches at transmitters and receivers. In addition, the authors in [6] have proposed a coding scheme for the F-RAN with caches only at the transmitters and shown that this scheme is order optimal for any popularity distribution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The work in [5] has studied an F-RAN with caches at both transmitters and receivers under the assumption that the content placement is applied in a decentralized manner. In [6], the authors have characterized both the peak NDT and the expected NDT under uniform popularity distribution for F-RAN with caches at transmitters and receivers. In addition, the authors in [6] have proposed a coding scheme for the F-RAN with caches only at the transmitters and shown that this scheme is order optimal for any popularity distribution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [6], the authors have characterized both the peak NDT and the expected NDT under uniform popularity distribution for F-RAN with caches at transmitters and receivers. In addition, the authors in [6] have proposed a coding scheme for the F-RAN with caches only at the transmitters and shown that this scheme is order optimal for any popularity distribution. The work in [7]- [9] studied SISO interference networks with caches at both transmitters and receivers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, in the peak hours when the network is congested, caches can be exploited to serve the receivers requests with a significant improvement in the system performance. The rule of caching in interference networks is studied in [1]- [10]. In [1], the degrees of freedom (DoF) of a 3 × 3 interference network with cache-equipped transmitters was studied.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [4], the normalized delivery time (NDT) which defines the delivery latency is introduced as a performance metric to study the fog radio access network (F-RAN) with two transmitters and two receivers. The work in [6]- [10] studied interference networks and F-RANs with caches at both transmitters and receivers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%