1997
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4471-0965-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fundamental Limitations in Filtering and Control

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
396
0
12

Year Published

1999
1999
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 471 publications
(422 citation statements)
references
References 89 publications
4
396
0
12
Order By: Relevance
“…If this is not the case, then the effect of a right half-plane zero may be distributed between both outputs. See [30] …”
Section: B Zero Directionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…If this is not the case, then the effect of a right half-plane zero may be distributed between both outputs. See [30] …”
Section: B Zero Directionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several new results, particularly for scalar and multivariable linear systems, have been presented. Bode's original result together with extensions are covered in the textbooks [10], [30]. Zames and Francis [9], [36], [38] showed that right half-plane zeros impose restrictions on the sensitivity function: if the sensitivity is forced to be small in one frequency band, it has to be large in another, possibly yielding an overall bad performance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For a linear time invariant (LTI) plant it is well understood that its unstable poles, non minimum phase (NMP) zeros and time-delay will cause unavoidable limitations in performance (see for example Seron et al (1997) and references therein). In more recent years, the study of fundamental limitations has been extended to problems of control over communication channels and has attracted growing interest (see for example Antsaklis and Baillieul (2004) and the recent survey by Nair et al (2007)).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it is well-known that many linear control loops suffer from certain inherent performance trade-offs such as the waterbed effect [3,4]: an increase of low-frequency (below the bandwidth) disturbance suppression automatically yields an increase of noise amplification at high frequencies (above the bandwidth). Given this trade-off, linear motion controllers are designed to balance between low-frequency tracking and sensitivity to high-frequency disturbances.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%