2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2014.09.038
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fundamental frequency of a cantilever composite cylindrical shell

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The number of circumferential waves in the modes generally decreases with the increasing thickness and l/r ratio conforming with the results presented in [46]. Once again, all second mode shapes are different for maximum ω 1 and ω 2 − ω 1 designs.…”
Section: Eigenfrequency Optimization For Cantilever Cylinderssupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The number of circumferential waves in the modes generally decreases with the increasing thickness and l/r ratio conforming with the results presented in [46]. Once again, all second mode shapes are different for maximum ω 1 and ω 2 − ω 1 designs.…”
Section: Eigenfrequency Optimization For Cantilever Cylinderssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The results for cantilever cylinders are presented in this subsection. Such structures can represent parts of aerospace structures such as space telescopes, hence their dynamic behavior is practically of interest [46]. Figure 4 shows the contour plots with the points of maximum values (red squares) for the first two normalized eigenfrequencies and their differences in the lamination parameter plane.…”
Section: Eigenfrequency Optimization For Cantilever Cylindersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The design of composite structures requires the selection of appropriate values of certain control parameters that describe both the structure itself and the material that it is made from [ 1 , 2 ]. The number of composite layers and their stacking sequence are, among others, frequently used for tuning selected properties of composite structures [ 3 ] (e.g., desired vibration frequency spectrum [ 4 , 5 ], buckling behavior [ 6 ], or structure’s stiffness [ 7 ]). The values of the parameters that give the expected results are often determined through the optimization process [ 8 ], namely through repeated calculation of the so-called objective function, which is minimized in the space of varying parameters (e.g., lamination angles).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The wave propagation method was applied by Li [5], Zhang [6] and Iqbal et al [7]. Lopatin and Morozov [8] solved the problem of a cantilever composite cylindrical shell using Galerkin method to find the fundamental frequencies. In addition, Haar wavelet method was used by Xie et al [9] to analyse the free vibration of cylindrical shell based on Goldenveizer-Novozhilov shell theory.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%