Questions of Modern Cosmology 2009
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-00792-7_2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fundamental Cosmological Observations and Data Interpretation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 483 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One can predict the apparent magnitude of a quasar with "maximum" mass and radiating at Eddington limit and derive some constraint on the distance scale. If this computation is carried out (Bartelmann et al, 2009), one derives H 0 values that are in agreement with present-day estimates (≈ 60-70 km s −1 Mpc −1 ). Clearly we are a far cry from the original Hubble estimate of 500 km s −1 Mpc −1 (Hubble, 1929).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…One can predict the apparent magnitude of a quasar with "maximum" mass and radiating at Eddington limit and derive some constraint on the distance scale. If this computation is carried out (Bartelmann et al, 2009), one derives H 0 values that are in agreement with present-day estimates (≈ 60-70 km s −1 Mpc −1 ). Clearly we are a far cry from the original Hubble estimate of 500 km s −1 Mpc −1 (Hubble, 1929).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Quasars show properties that make them potential cosmological probes [e.g, 69,6]: they are plentiful, very luminous, and are detected at very early cosmic epochs (currently out to redshift 7). However, they have never been successfully exploited as distance indicators in the past decades.…”
Section: Spectral Energy Distributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Quasars have a tremendous potential for cosmology, but their potential is as yet unexploited since they are not standard candles in conventional terms. Early efforts to establish correlations between luminosity and one or more parameters (for example, the equivalent width of high-ionization lines, the so-called Baldwin effects, Baldwin et al 1978) did not live up to cosmological expectations (some early and some recent attempts are reviewed in the Chapter by Bartelmann et al 2009 in D'Onofrio and. Nonetheless, in the last few years several methods have been proposed for the use of quasars as redshiftindependent distance indicators, or as standard rulers.…”
Section: Quasars and Observational Cosmologymentioning
confidence: 99%