2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.elstat.2018.04.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fundamental characteristics of discharge plasma generated in a water cavitation field

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
8
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In principle, the method relies on the formation of vapour cavities in a liquid, with plasma being produced in the bubble cloud that is formed downstream of the reactor nozzle through cavitation. Plasma is produced through the application of high voltage to an electrode pair mounted in the reactor [14]. We modified this method for gentle treatment of cyanobacterial biomass with the aim of reducing cyanobacterial cell photosynthetic activity without cell lysis or release of cyanotoxins.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In principle, the method relies on the formation of vapour cavities in a liquid, with plasma being produced in the bubble cloud that is formed downstream of the reactor nozzle through cavitation. Plasma is produced through the application of high voltage to an electrode pair mounted in the reactor [14]. We modified this method for gentle treatment of cyanobacterial biomass with the aim of reducing cyanobacterial cell photosynthetic activity without cell lysis or release of cyanotoxins.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The combined effect of hydrodynamic cavitation and discharge plasma led to a single-pass removal of all cyanobacteria with no increase in microcystin concentration in treated water. In actual numbers, 6 L of cyanobacteria contaminated water (5 × 10 5 cells/mL) was disinfected in less than 15 s. This volume efficiency is a remarkable improvement over the known methods of underwater discharge generation (Table 1), even when we compare the HCPJ with a few known works where authors also employed cavitation clouds to sustain the underwater discharge [29,32,33]. Very recently, a plasma-cavitation device for water treatment of throughput similar to ours was presented in [30], but unfortunately no details were given in the article with respect to discharge ignition or energy consumption, so we can not make a qualified comparison to our previous results in [28].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Treatment of E. coli cells with pulsed discharges with cavitation bubbles leads to the formation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) from the generated plasma, which decreases the viability of the cells and induces DNA damage in E. coli [14] . Ihara et al [15] analyzed the impact of solution conductivity and discharge frequency of discharge plasma formed in HCB on water treatment efficiency. A nozzle-less structure reactor has been developed to increase the efficacy of plasma generated by HCB in water treatment [16] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%