2009
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1477859
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fund-of-Funds Construction by Statistical Multiple Testing Methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
(2 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Most of the research on FOF focuses on the selection of funds. Wolf and Wunderlin used multiple testing methods to select the fund, and found that the resulting FOF portfolios have attractive return properties compared to the 1/N portfolio [1]. Studies have shown that by selecting appropriate funds (skilful fund manager) and time can yield better returns than natural competitor.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of the research on FOF focuses on the selection of funds. Wolf and Wunderlin used multiple testing methods to select the fund, and found that the resulting FOF portfolios have attractive return properties compared to the 1/N portfolio [1]. Studies have shown that by selecting appropriate funds (skilful fund manager) and time can yield better returns than natural competitor.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the generic shrinkage target seems less appropriate for a covariance matrix of a universe of stock returns. The target (3.5) was first suggested by Ledoit (1995, Appendix B.1), then was also proposed by Schäfer and Strimmer (2005) in a different context related to genomics, and has been used by Wolf and Wunderli (2012) to estimate the covariance matrix of a universe of hedge fund returns.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%