2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2021.01.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fund Black scientists

Abstract: Our nationwide network of BME women faculty collectively argue that racial funding disparity by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) remains the most insidious barrier to success of Black faculty in our profession. We thus refocus attention on this critical barrier and suggest solutions on how it can be dismantled.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
109
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 127 publications
(125 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
(31 reference statements)
1
109
0
Order By: Relevance
“…NIH can no longer look the other way. Among the challenging issues that the agency must confront head on are a failure to acknowledge first-hand accounts of racism in the workplace reported by people of color throughout the biomedical research enterprise; a long-standing failure to attract, retain, and promote to the highest levels scientists from underrepresented racial and ethnic groups in the biomedical research workforce; persistent disparities in the success rates for grants supporting Black scientists (Ginther et al, 2011;Hoppe et al, 2019;Stevens et al, 2021;Lauer et al, 2021); lack of transparent race-based demographic data linked to grant success and funding rates; ''siloing'' of NIH diversity initiatives rather than including them as a fundamental element across NIH; and significant underfunding of research on minority health, health disparities, and health inequities.…”
Section: Where We Are Headingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…NIH can no longer look the other way. Among the challenging issues that the agency must confront head on are a failure to acknowledge first-hand accounts of racism in the workplace reported by people of color throughout the biomedical research enterprise; a long-standing failure to attract, retain, and promote to the highest levels scientists from underrepresented racial and ethnic groups in the biomedical research workforce; persistent disparities in the success rates for grants supporting Black scientists (Ginther et al, 2011;Hoppe et al, 2019;Stevens et al, 2021;Lauer et al, 2021); lack of transparent race-based demographic data linked to grant success and funding rates; ''siloing'' of NIH diversity initiatives rather than including them as a fundamental element across NIH; and significant underfunding of research on minority health, health disparities, and health inequities.…”
Section: Where We Are Headingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As I stood by my new colleague, a gifted scientist and rising star in her field, I shared her frustration at having grant after grant application rejected for years before she finally succeeded. There was no denying that racial bias by funding panels ( 16 ) was part of the story. There was anguish and anger along the way, but we persisted and the payoff was tremendous.…”
Section: On Belonging In Sciencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considerable attention is now focused on structural racism, defined as the totality of ways that society fosters racial discrimination via inequitable systems (e.g., housing, education, health care). This systematic inequity continues to reinforce and perpetuate a lack of diversity and talent in scientific endeavors and injustices within the research community (12)(13)(14).…”
Section: My Experience At Johns Hopkinsmentioning
confidence: 99%