2017
DOI: 10.1112/s0010437x17007084
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Functorial destackification of tame stacks with abelian stabilisers

Abstract: We give an algorithm for removing stackiness from smooth, tame Artin stacks with abelian stabilisers by repeatedly applying stacky blow-ups. The construction works over a general base and is functorial with respect to base change and compositions with gerbes and smooth, stabiliser preserving maps. As applications, we indicate how the result can be used for destackifying general Deligne-Mumford stacks in characteristic zero, and to obtain a weak factorisation theorem for such stacks. Over an arbitrary field, th… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
59
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
59
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Remark 2. While the general destackification process outlined in [7] requires stacky blow-ups, it is never necessary to take root stacks when all stabilizers are powers of µ 2 .…”
Section: Proof the Of The Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Remark 2. While the general destackification process outlined in [7] requires stacky blow-ups, it is never necessary to take root stacks when all stabilizers are powers of µ 2 .…”
Section: Proof the Of The Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This spreads out to a coherent sheaf E on G, which we may take to be reflexive, hence [33] only failing to be locally free, if at all, on a locus of codimension ≥ 3. • By a standard construction (closure in Grassmannian of rank 3 quotients of E), followed by desingularization and destackification [14], we may suppose that E is locally free and R is an iterated root stack 3 ( S, { D 1 , . .…”
Section: Local Analysis IImentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fixing i and letting K j denote the kernel of (A.15), we write the corresponding short exact sequences for consecutive values j = n − 1 and j = n and connect them by homomorphisms of the form (A. 14), to see that the induced homomorphism of kernels K n → K n−1 is surjective. After applying lim ← − we obtain a short exact sequence, which tells us that…”
Section: Appendix a Birational Contractionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proof of (3) =⇒ (1) is given for fppf gerbes in [3,Proposition A.2], it is also valid for fpqc gerbes.…”
Section: Generalities On Affine Gerbesmentioning
confidence: 99%