2009
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-03073-4_42
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Functions Definable by Arithmetic Circuits

Abstract: Abstract. An arithmetic circuit (McKenzie and Wagner [6]) is a labelled, directed graph specifying a cascade of arithmetic and logical operations to be performed on sets of non-negative integers. In this paper, we consider the definability of functions by means of arithmetic circuits. We prove two negative results: the first shows, roughly, that a function is not circuit-definable if it has an infinite range and sub-linear growth; the second shows, roughly, that a function is not circuit-definable if it has a … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Apart from the research on circuit problems mentioned above there has been work on other variants like circuits over integers [26] and positive natural numbers [27], equivalence problems for circuits [28], functions computed by circuits [29], and equations over sets of natural numbers [30,31]. Typically, the complexity of membership of circuits is similar to the corresponding equivalence of circuits problem, though the latter may be slightly higher and belies some imperfect bounds 2 .…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Apart from the research on circuit problems mentioned above there has been work on other variants like circuits over integers [26] and positive natural numbers [27], equivalence problems for circuits [28], functions computed by circuits [29], and equations over sets of natural numbers [30,31]. Typically, the complexity of membership of circuits is similar to the corresponding equivalence of circuits problem, though the latter may be slightly higher and belies some imperfect bounds 2 .…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ordering ≤ on ω corresponds to the function defined by f (x) = {n ∈ ω : (∃m)[m ∈ x and n ≤ m}, and we have shown in [16] that this function is not circuit definable. In the same paper we have proved (ii).…”
Section: Proofmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such set exists, since every every set definable by an arithmetic circuit is in the bounded hierarchy BH [16], and the bounded hierarchy is known to be contained within the zeroth Grzegorczyk class, E 0 * . By Lemma 4.1 there is a first order sentence (∃x)ϕ(x) such that Cm N |= ϕ(x/s) if and only if s = a.…”
Section: Proofmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Apart from the research on circuit problems mentioned above there has been work on other variants like circuits over integers [26] and positive natural numbers [27], equivalence problems for circuits [28], functions computed by circuits [29], and equations over sets of natural numbers [30,31]. Typically, the complexity of membership of circuits is similar to the corresponding equivalence of circuits problem, though the latter may be slightly higher and belies some imperfect bounds 2 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%