2003
DOI: 10.1176/appi.ajgp.11.6.629
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Functioning and Well-Being of Middle-Aged and Older Patients With Schizophrenia: Measurement With the 36-Item Short-Form (SF-36) Health Survey

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
37
1
6

Year Published

2004
2004
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
2
37
1
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Participants included males and females with a mean age of participants with a schizophrenia spectrum disorder, reported in 21 of the 33 studies, ranging between 20.3 and 57.9 years. 48,68,[70][71][72][73][75][76][77][78][79][80]82,84,86,[88][89][90][91]94,95 All studies obtained HRQoL information from patients; seven of these studies compared patient HRQoL values with published general population 'normative' values, [70][71][72][73][74][75][76] three compared HRQoL values with normal comparison participants that were recruited to the study [77][78][79] and two used 'norms' from healthy participants who had taken part in large surveys.…”
Section: Schizophreniamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Participants included males and females with a mean age of participants with a schizophrenia spectrum disorder, reported in 21 of the 33 studies, ranging between 20.3 and 57.9 years. 48,68,[70][71][72][73][75][76][77][78][79][80]82,84,86,[88][89][90][91]94,95 All studies obtained HRQoL information from patients; seven of these studies compared patient HRQoL values with published general population 'normative' values, [70][71][72][73][74][75][76] three compared HRQoL values with normal comparison participants that were recruited to the study [77][78][79] and two used 'norms' from healthy participants who had taken part in large surveys.…”
Section: Schizophreniamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…66,67,[69][70][71][72][73][74][75][76][77][78][79][80][81][82][83][84][85]88,[92][93][94][95] Although there appears to be strong evidence that the SF-36 is able to distinguish between general population norms and scores of people with schizophrenia (known-group validity), the evidence for convergent validity and responsiveness is less certain ( Table 4). Similar findings exist for the EQ-5D, with mixed evidence for the properties of convergent validity and responsiveness.…”
Section: Schizophreniamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lower everyday functioning capacity and greater severity of positive, negative, and depressive symptoms have been associated with worse QOL (Hofer et al, 2005b;Norman et al, 2000;Palmer et al, 2002;Sciolla et al, 2003;Corrigan & Buican, 1995;Jin et al, 2001;Ruggeri et al, 2005;Twamley et al, 2002). Although such psychiatric symptoms have been associated with subjective measures of QOL (Hofer et al, 2005b;Ruggeri et al, 2005;Norman et al, 2000;Corrigan and Buican, 1995), symptom reductions alone often do not result in meaningful improvements in QOL because other problems remain (e.g., difficulty with everyday functioning, lack of social contacts, unemployment, and stigmatization).…”
Section: Predictors Of Subjective Qolmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indicators of objective QOL include living situation, marital status, employment status, driving status, and involvement in social activities. Generally, patients with less severe psychiatric symptoms and better cognitive performance report better outcomes on objective QOL indicators (Hofer et al, 2005b;Palmer et al, 2002;Sciolla et al, 2003;Jin et al, 2001;Ruggeri et al, 2005). Performance-based functional capacity also has been found to predict objective QOL, particularly in terms of driving and living independence Twamley et al, 2002).…”
Section: Predictors Of Objective Qolmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been extensively validated against factors such as work capacity, disease symptoms, use of care services and measures of mental health [38]. The SF-36 has been most commonly used to determine: 1) the patients' point of view or an outcome in relation to an intervention on a particular condition (before and after studies) [39]; or 2) the effect of a condition on HRQoL [40]. The instrument has also been used as a multidimensional measure of healthy ageing [41].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%