2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2022.116075
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Functionally graded carbon nanotubes reinforced composite structures: An extensive review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 224 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…CNTs as a high‐performance nanoscale reinforcement showing a number of advantages such as lightweight, large aspect ratio, stable chemical property, and ultrahigh mechanical strength (e.g., elastic modulus ~0.4–1 TPa, and tensile strength ~10–50 GPa), have been widely employed in structural and functional composites 16,17 . However, even up to now, the mechanical strengthening effect provided by incorporating CNTs into polymer‐based composites is still fallen short of the theoretical expectations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…CNTs as a high‐performance nanoscale reinforcement showing a number of advantages such as lightweight, large aspect ratio, stable chemical property, and ultrahigh mechanical strength (e.g., elastic modulus ~0.4–1 TPa, and tensile strength ~10–50 GPa), have been widely employed in structural and functional composites 16,17 . However, even up to now, the mechanical strengthening effect provided by incorporating CNTs into polymer‐based composites is still fallen short of the theoretical expectations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[12][13][14][15] CNTs as a high-performance nanoscale reinforcement showing a number of advantages such as lightweight, large aspect ratio, stable chemical property, and ultrahigh mechanical strength (e.g., elastic modulus $0.4-1 TPa, and tensile strength $10-50 GPa), have been widely employed in structural and functional composites. 16,17 However, even up to now, the mechanical strengthening effect provided by incorporating CNTs into polymer-based composites is still fallen short of the theoretical expectations. In fact, this is mainly attributed to the following reasons: (i) In the preparation of CNTs, the diameter, length and surface defects of each CNT cannot be effectively controlled; (ii) the large inherent surface energy and high pristine aspect ratio make CNTs easily agglomerated and entangled, which greatly enhances the difficulty of being uniformly dispersed in polymer matrices during traditional mixing processes; (iii) due to its ultrahigh specific surface area, even a small amount of CNTs is able to sharply increase the viscosity of blend and to destroy the initial excellent processibility of polymers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Along with advanced airplane materials, potential applications of CF are: CO 2 capture for reducing climate change [ 1 ]; battery electrodes applied to EVs [ 2 ]; and advancement of utilizations for thermally conductive carbon-reinforced composites [ 3 ]. Besides CF [ 4 , 5 ], several types of carbon reinforcements have been used, including: carbon nanotubes [ 6 , 7 ], carbon nanofibers [ 8 ], graphite, graphene, carbon black [ 9 ], and ultrathin carbon nanotube (CNT) veils to enhance interlaminar toughness [ 10 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…nanotubes [6,7], carbon nanofibers [8], graphite, graphene, carbon black [9], and ultrathin carbon nanotube (CNT) veils to enhance interlaminar toughness [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6 The higher-order shear deformation theory (HSDT) is also applied in the FG-CNTRC pipes where the large deflection in concerned. 7 Recently, in addition to vibration, bending, and buckling analysis, 8,9 the dynamic impact characteristics of FG-CNTRC have also been considered. Fallah et al 10 proposed a semi-analytical strategy to reveal the low velocity impact (LVI) behavior of FG-CNTRC, based on Runge-Kutta and Ritz methods, where the kinematics are computed based on HSDT.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%