2014
DOI: 10.1002/adem.201300579
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Functionally Graded Alloys Obtained by Additive Manufacturing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
50
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 107 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
(32 reference statements)
2
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The average grain size for the AM sample was 21 ± 6 μm and anisotropic (elongated in the build direction) whilst the conventional sample was 13 ± 3 μm and equi-axed. This anisotropy in AM samples has been noted by others 5 and is likely due to the large thermal gradients that are set up during the build process when melt pools form and preferentially orientate as they cool. Results from AM cylinders are shown in Fig 3. and Fig 4. alongside simulations completed using the Eulerian hydrocode CTH.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 68%
“…The average grain size for the AM sample was 21 ± 6 μm and anisotropic (elongated in the build direction) whilst the conventional sample was 13 ± 3 μm and equi-axed. This anisotropy in AM samples has been noted by others 5 and is likely due to the large thermal gradients that are set up during the build process when melt pools form and preferentially orientate as they cool. Results from AM cylinders are shown in Fig 3. and Fig 4. alongside simulations completed using the Eulerian hydrocode CTH.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 68%
“…due to the neighbouring scan track or subsequent layer being generated, the grains of the already solidified materials become altered by the secondary heat input [38]. This behaviour is commonly referred to as epitaxial grain growth, describing the tendency of needle-like grain growth towards the heat source [41,42]. Due to this tendency, the grains of 1.4404 grew through the individual layers (in direction of the heat source), causing an interlocking of the individual layers ( Figure 9).…”
Section: Comprehensive Analysis Of the Directional Dependencies And Tmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In any case, the physical quantities dominating the solidification and resulting microstructures were the thermal gradient G in combination with the solidification velocity v, as discussed in more detail by Gäumann et al for epitaxial laser metal forming [21]. In [22] it was shown that, applying different lasers in distinct areas, fully intact parts of locally different mechanical behaviour can be directly produced.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%