2023
DOI: 10.3390/cells12050767
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Functionalizing Collagen Membranes with MSC-Conditioned Media Promotes Guided Bone Regeneration in Rat Calvarial Defects

Abstract: Functionalizing biomaterials with conditioned media (CM) from mesenchymal stromal cells (MSC) is a promising strategy for enhancing the outcomes of guided bone regeneration (GBR). This study aimed to evaluate the bone regenerative potential of collagen membranes (MEM) functionalized with CM from human bone marrow MSC (MEM-CM) in critical size rat calvarial defects. MEM-CM prepared via soaking (CM-SOAK) or soaking followed by lyophilization (CM-LYO) were applied to critical size rat calvarial defects. Control t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
22
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 107 publications
3
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite considerable biological variation within each treatment group, significantly greater 3D bone coverage was observed in MSC‐CM vs. PRF‐CM treated defects via micro‐CT after 2 and 4 weeks. The present data are consistent with that of our previous study where, using the same method of membrane functionalization, greater bone coverage was observed in MSC‐CM vs. native membrane treated defects (positive control) and untreated defects (negative control) (Shanbhag et al., 2023). After 4 weeks, untreated defects revealed <30% average bone formation, while application of a native membrane (GBR) increased bone formation to 58% and functionalization of the membrane with MSC‐CM further increased it to 79% (Shanbhag et al., 2023), which is similar to the average bone formation observed in the MSC‐CM group in the present study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Despite considerable biological variation within each treatment group, significantly greater 3D bone coverage was observed in MSC‐CM vs. PRF‐CM treated defects via micro‐CT after 2 and 4 weeks. The present data are consistent with that of our previous study where, using the same method of membrane functionalization, greater bone coverage was observed in MSC‐CM vs. native membrane treated defects (positive control) and untreated defects (negative control) (Shanbhag et al., 2023). After 4 weeks, untreated defects revealed <30% average bone formation, while application of a native membrane (GBR) increased bone formation to 58% and functionalization of the membrane with MSC‐CM further increased it to 79% (Shanbhag et al., 2023), which is similar to the average bone formation observed in the MSC‐CM group in the present study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The present data are consistent with that of our previous study where, using the same method of membrane functionalization, greater bone coverage was observed in MSC‐CM vs. native membrane treated defects (positive control) and untreated defects (negative control) (Shanbhag et al., 2023). After 4 weeks, untreated defects revealed <30% average bone formation, while application of a native membrane (GBR) increased bone formation to 58% and functionalization of the membrane with MSC‐CM further increased it to 79% (Shanbhag et al., 2023), which is similar to the average bone formation observed in the MSC‐CM group in the present study. Since only a barrier membrane is applied without a bone substitute filling the defect, this model can be considered to assess the ‘true’ GBR potential of the defect and any enhancements of this inherent potential by added treatments, such as MSC‐CM.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 3 more Smart Citations