2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.reactfunctpolym.2015.09.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Functionalized bicomponent polymer membranes as supports for covalent immobilization of enzymes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2D) showed an increase in the peak intensity of ~70 °C, probably caused by enzyme denaturation added to the water removal energy. Another endothermic peak verified at ~200 °C was likely due to residual glycerol of commercial enzyme (Sandu et al, 2015). Immobead-Ac-KL-Gal kept the exothermic peak at 210 °C and showed other variation peaks at higher temperatures.…”
Section: Thermal and Physico-chemical Study Of Treated Immobead Supports And Their Derivativesmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…2D) showed an increase in the peak intensity of ~70 °C, probably caused by enzyme denaturation added to the water removal energy. Another endothermic peak verified at ~200 °C was likely due to residual glycerol of commercial enzyme (Sandu et al, 2015). Immobead-Ac-KL-Gal kept the exothermic peak at 210 °C and showed other variation peaks at higher temperatures.…”
Section: Thermal and Physico-chemical Study Of Treated Immobead Supports And Their Derivativesmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…To characterize the occurred changes, various techniques are employed. The characterization techniques like scanning electron microscopy/field emission scanning electron microscopy (SEM/FESEM), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), atomic force microscopy (AFM), Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), attenuated total reflectance‐Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (ATR‐FTIR), thermal gravimetry analysis (TGA), X‐ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), Raman spectroscopy, confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM), and inverted fluorescence microscopy (IFM) have been applied to characterize the enzyme immobilized membrane (Sandu et al., 2015; Taheran et al., 2017; Veismoradi et al., 2019; Wen‐qiong & Xiao‐feng, 2018; Xu et al., 2017). These techniques provide a comprehensive understanding of the enzyme confinement on a membrane and the possible effect on the performance of heterogeneous biocatalyst.…”
Section: Immobilization Of Enzymes On Membranementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whereas, FTIR, ATR‐FTIR, Raman spectroscopy, and XPS analysis assessed the enzyme immobilization as well determined surface chemical composition. Investigation of thermal behavior of enzyme carrying membrane sample was carried out by TGA analysis (Sandu et al., 2015). Whereas, protein distribution on membrane support is examined by IFM and CLSM.…”
Section: Immobilization Of Enzymes On Membranementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Enzymatic membrane bioreactors (EMBRs), combined with enzyme immobilization and membrane technology, exhibit synergistic catalysis and separation by integrating the high catalytic efficiency of enzymes with the high selectivity of membrane separation; this technique has shown great potential in many fields, such as the food industry, chemical manufacturing, and environmental purposes [ 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 ]. Nevertheless, there are still some concerns and urgent problems to be solved in the future research and application of EMBRs, one of the most crucial of which is the enhancement of the catalytic properties [ 7 , 8 , 9 ]. The performance of EMBRs is mainly dependent on the enzyme loading and activity, which are intricately connected with the microstructure and microenvironment of the supporting membrane, respectively [ 10 , 11 , 12 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%